ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2020
Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic Impact ofJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of the Gastroenterology Department Patients Towards Chronic Gastritis in Shanxi Region: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Controlling the Impact ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Family-basedWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Chinese Consensus Report on Family-BasedGut · 2022Article
- The management ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Helicobacter pylori reinfection and its risk factors after initial eradication: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the recurrence rate of
methodsOutpatients who were eradicated of
resultsIn total, 400 patients (225 males and 175 females) were included in this study. Of them, the recurrence rate of
conclusionsThe overall recurrence rate after
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.