ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2020
Bioinformatic Detection of Positive Selection Pressure in Plant Pathogens: The Neutral Theory of Molecular Sequence Evolution in Action.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gene presence-absence and evolutionary signals of positive selection associated with virulence divergence inMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- How to frustrate a plant pathogen.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026Review
- Experimental evolution reveals genomic signatures of variety-specific selection of Cercospora beticola in Germany.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- In Silico Identification of Pathogenicity Effectors onBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Advances in Diversity, Evolutionary Dynamics and Biotechnological Potential of Restriction-Modification Systems.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Population-level whole-genome sequencing ofMicrobial genomics · 2024Article
- Emergence and spread of the barley net blotch pathogen coincided with crop domestication and cultivation history.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Molecular Footprints ofAdvances in virology · 2024Article
- Recent gene selection and drug resistance underscore clinical adaptation across Candida species.Nature microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Potential Fitness Effects of Chinook Salmon (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Comparative genomic study of the Penicillium genus elucidates a diverse pangenome and 15 lateral gene transfer events.IMA fungus · 2023Article
- Cryptic genetic structure and copy-number variation in the ubiquitous forest symbiotic fungus Cenococcum geophilum.Environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Dynamics of Verticillium dahliae race 1 population under managed agricultural ecosystems.BMC biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genomes of plant pathogenic fungi and oomycetes are often exposed to strong positive selection pressure. During speciation, shifts in host range and preference can lead to major adaptive changes. Furthermore, evolution of total host resistance to most isolates can force rapid evolutionary changes in host-specific pathogens. Crop pathogens are subjected to particularly intense selective pressures from monocultures and fungicides. Detection of the footprints of positive selection in plant pathogen genomes is a worthwhile endeavor as it aids understanding of the fundamental biology of these important organisms. There are two main classes of test for detection of positively selected alleles. Tests based on the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions per site detect the footprints of multiple fixation events between divergent lineages. Thus, they are well-suited to the study of ancient adaptation events spanning speciations. On the other hand, tests that scan genomes for local fluctuations in allelic diversity within populations are suitable for detection of recent positive selection in populations. In this review, I briefly describe some of the more widely used tests of positive selection and the theory underlying them. I then discuss various examples of their application to plant pathogen genomes, emphasizing the types of genes that are associated with signatures of positive selection. I conclude with a discussion of the practicality of such tests for identification of pathogen genes of interest and the important features of pathogen ecology that must be taken into account for accurate interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.