Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Adding Appropriate Fiber in Diet Increases Diversity and Metabolic Capacity of Distal Gut Microbiota Without Altering Fiber Digestibility and Growth Rate of Finishing Pig.

Guang Pu, Pinghua Li, Taoran Du, Qing Niu, Lijuan Fan, Huan Wang, Hang Liu, Kaijun Li, Peipei Niu, Chengwu Wu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Effects of supplementalAnimal biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Supplementation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guang PuInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Pinghua LiInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Taoran DuInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Qing NiuInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Lijuan FanInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Huan WangInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Hang LiuInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Kaijun LiInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Peipei NiuHuaian Academy, Nanjing Agricultural University, Huaian, China.
Chengwu WuIndustrial Technology System Integration Innovation Center of Jiangsu Modern Agriculture (PIG), Nanjing, China.
Wuduo ZhouInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Ruihua HuangInstitute of Swine Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNThe Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digestion ability of pigs to dietary fiber is derived from their intestinal microbiota, especially hindgut microbiota. However, tolerance of pigs to high dietary fiber and the changes of microbiota profile with fiber levels are still unclear. To investigate the changes of gut microbiota with dietary fiber and its relationship with fiber digestibility, we conducted comparative analyses of growth rate, apparent fiber digestibility, gut microbiota and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles in Chinese Suhuai pigs feeding diets with different defatted rice bran (DFRB) fiber levels. We found that dietary fiber level had no effect on the growth rate of Suhuai pigs. Although the apparent digestibility of Cellulose, insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and total dietary fiber (TDF) decreased with dietary fiber level, we found that the apparent digestibility of Cellulose, IDF and TDF of Suhuai pigs was not changed when provided with diet containing 19.10% TDF (as feed basis). The pigs provided with diet containing 19.10% TDF had higher microbial richness, proportions of several fiber-degrading bacteria taxa at genus level and predicted microbial functions (such as carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism) in cecum compared to those fed with basal diet. In addition, the fiber-induced increasing of fiber-degrading bacteria promoted the VFAs metabolism, which potentially helped Suhuai pigs to maintain growth rate. However, as TDF reached to 24.11% (as feed basis), the apparent digestibility of fiber decreased and the positive effect on intestine microbiota in caecum were absent. Together, our data suggest that appropriate fiber level could increase the diversity and metabolic capacity of distal gut microbiota to improve the utilization efficiency of fiber resources without altering the growth rate of pigs.

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene sequencingcaecumfiber intakeinsoluble dietary fiberVFA

Identifiers

PMID32328041
PMCPMC7160236
OpenAlexW3015414699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.