Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32327986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020

Swallow Motor Pattern Is Modulated by Fixed or Stochastic Alterations in Afferent Feedback.

Suzanne N King, Tabitha Y Shen, M Nicholas Musselwhite, Alyssa Huff, Mitchell D Reed, Ivan Poliacek, Dena R Howland, Warren Dixon, Kendall F Morris, Donald C Bolser and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deglutition and the Regulation of the Swallow Motor Pattern.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023 · on this map
    Review
  7. Optogenetic stimulation of pre-Bötzinger complex reveals novel circuit interactions in swallowing-breathing coordination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne N KingDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Tabitha Y ShenDepartment of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
M Nicholas MusselwhiteDepartment of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Alyssa HuffKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Mitchell D ReedKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Ivan PoliacekDepartment of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Dena R HowlandKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Warren DixonDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Kendall F MorrisDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Donald C BolserDepartment of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Kimberly E IcemanKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Teresa PittsKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
University of Florida · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity of Louisville · USComenius University Bratislava · SKUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Functional mapping of peripheral and central circuits for airway protection and breathingOT2OD023854 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOLSER, DONALD C · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
Mechanisms of Swallow Control of BreathingR01HL109025 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DAVENPORT, PAUL W, MORRIS, KENDALL FRANCIS · 2012 to 2015
$2.9M
Central Mechanisms of Airway ProtectionR01HL103415 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BOLSER, DONALD C, DAVENPORT, PAUL W · 2010 to 2013
$2.2M
Regulation of swallow and the effects of high cervical spinal cord injuryR01NS110169 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI PITTS, TERESA G · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
Regulation of Airway Protective BehaviorsR00HL111215 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI PITTS, TERESA G · 2015 to 2017
$731k
Regulation of Airway Protective BehaviorsK99HL111215 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PITTS, TERESA G · 2013 to 2014
$267k
Stopped-Flow SpectrometerS10OD023584 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI YEATES, TODD O · 2017 to 2017
$106k
NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL111215NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL111215NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103415NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109025NIH HHS OT2 OD023854NIH HHS S10 OD023584NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Afferent feedback can appreciably alter the pharyngeal phase of swallow. In order to measure the stability of the swallow motor pattern during several types of alterations in afferent feedback, we assessed swallow during a conventional water challenge in four anesthetized cats, and compared that to swallows induced by fixed (20 Hz) and stochastic (1-20Hz) electrical stimulation applied to the superior laryngeal nerve. The swallow motor patterns were evaluated by electromyographic activity (EMG) of eight muscles, based on their functional significance: laryngeal elevators (mylohyoid, geniohyoid, and thyrohyoid); laryngeal adductor (thyroarytenoid); inferior pharyngeal constrictor (thyropharyngeus); upper esophageal sphincter (cricopharyngeus); and inspiratory activity (parasternal and costal diaphragm). Both the fixed and stochastic electrical stimulation paradigms increased activity of the laryngeal elevators, produced short-term facilitation evidenced by increasing swallow durations over the stimulus period, and conversely inhibited swallow-related diaphragm activity. Both the fixed and stochastic stimulus conditions also increased specific EMG amplitudes, which never occurred with the water challenges. Stochastic stimulation increased swallow excitability, as measured by an increase in the number of swallows produced. Consistent with our previous results, changes in the swallow motor pattern for pairs of muscles were only sometimes correlated with each other. We conclude that alterations in afferent feedback produced particular variations of the swallow motor pattern. We hypothesize that specific SLN feedback might modulate the swallow central pattern generator during aberrant feeding conditions (food/liquid entering the airway), which may protect the airway and serve as potentially important clinical diagnostic indicators.

Indexed as

deglutitiondiaphragmelectrical stimulationfacilitationschluckatmungstochasticswallow

Identifiers

PMID32327986
PMCPMC7160698
OpenAlexW3015488646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.