Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32327916›Full record

ReviewMacromolecular chemistry and physics2019

Progress in the Development of Intrinsically Conducting Polymer Composites as Biosensors.

Deepak G Prajapati, Balasubramanian Kandasubramanian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Macromolecular chemistry and physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecularly imprinted polymersRSC advances · 2022
    Review
  16. Conducting polymer-based sensors for food and drug analysis.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deepak G PrajapatiNano Texturing Laboratory Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Defence Institute of Advanced Technology Ministry of Defence Girinagar Pune 411025 India.
Balasubramanian KandasubramanianNano Texturing Laboratory Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Defence Institute of Advanced Technology Ministry of Defence Girinagar Pune 411025 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4257-8807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosensors are analytical devices which find extensive applications in fields such as the food industry, defense sector, environmental monitoring, and in clinical diagnosis. Similarly, intrinsically conducting polymers (ICPs) and their composites have lured immense interest in bio-sensing due to their various attributes like compatibility with biological molecules, efficient electron transfer upon biochemical reactions, loading of bio-reagent, and immobilization of biomolecules. Further, they are proficient in sensing diverse biological species and compounds like glucose (detection limit ≈0.18 nm), DNA (≈10 pm), cholesterol (≈1 µm), aptamer (≈0.8 pm), and also cancer cells (≈5 pm mL

Indexed as

biological moleculesbiosensorsconductive polymer compositesconductive polymersimmobilizationnanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID32327916
PMCPMC7168478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.