ArticleWildlife Society bulletin2019
Captive breeding of wildlife resources-China's revised supply-side approach to conservation.
Article in Wildlife Society bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Zoonotic public health risks in farmed versus wild-caught wildlife for traditional markets for food: A systematic review and meta-analysis.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Tick-Tac-Foe: When Ticks, Trade, and Zoonotic Pathogens Align in African Wet Meat Markets.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Illegal urban wild meat supply chain characterization: A case study on zoonosis in Lusaka, Zambia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Reviewing Evidence for the Impact of Lion Farming in South Africa on African Wild Lion Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Advancing green recovery: Integrating one health in sustainable wildlife management in the Asia-Pacific Indigenous People and Local Communities.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Wildlife policy, the food system and One Health: a complex systems analysis of unintended consequences for the prevention of emerging zoonoses in China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Philippines.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- The Status of Wildlife Damage Compensation in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- Wildlife Consumption, Health, and Zoonotic Disease in China After the Emergence of COVID-19.EcoHealth · 2023Article
- The tide of tiger poaching in India is rising! An investigation of the intertwined facts with a focus on conservation.GeoJournal · 2023Article
- Averting wildlife-borne infectious disease epidemics requires a focus on socio-ecological drivers and a redesign of the global food system.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Review
- A better classification of wet markets is key to safeguarding human health and biodiversity.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2021Review
- Why do we need a wildlife consumption ban in China?Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- Host Diversity and Potential Transmission Pathways of SARS-CoV-2 at the Human-Animal Interface.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Understanding China's wildlife markets: Trade and tradition in an age of pandemic.World development · 2020Article
- Current Societal Views about Sustainable Wildlife Management and Conservation: A Survey of College Students in China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Emerging Zoonotic Diseases: Should We Rethink the Animal-Human Interface?Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Diets, Diseases, and Discourse: Lessons from COVID-19 for Trade in Wildlife, Public Health, and Food Systems Reform.Food ethics · 2020Article
- Attitudes towards Wildlife Consumption inside and outside Hubei Province, China, in Relation to the SARS and COVID-19 Outbreaks.Human ecology: an interdisciplinary journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conservation and utilization of wild animals in China often raises public concerns. Thus, the Chinese government is increasingly exploring sustainable development of wildlife resources, and has implemented a series of measures, such as the modification of the Wildlife Protection Law (WPL), implementation of captive breeding licenses, an animal marking system, forest certification, and other actions to regulate captive breeding and utilization of wildlife. At the same time, the government tries to meet the Chinese traditional demand for wildlife products. We first introduce wildlife utilization as an internationally accepted conservation tool, and describe market-based wildlife farming as a legal substitute for wild-hunted animals. Second, we highlight the importance of wildlife products in Chinese culture and economy and review some successful examples of wildlife utilization in China, showing that the supply-side approach is a viable alternative to classical conservation. Subsequently, we outline benefits of, and drawbacks to, China's 'conservation through utilization' approach, resulting in the implementation of China's new, revised WPL. We discuss merits and shortcomings of China's revised WPL and respond to recent national and international criticism on China's supply-side approach to conservation. We strongly propose that captive breeding is a feasible approach to China's wildlife conservation-utilization dilemma, and much work is needed to promote the progress, such as legislation restructure, government attention, duties clarification, and so on. © 2019 The Wildlife Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.