Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32327474›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Reducing medicine-induced deterioration and adverse reactions (ReMInDAR) trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in residential aged-care facilities assessing frailty as the primary outcome.

Renly Lim, Luke Bereznicki, Megan Corlis, Lisa M Kalisch Ellett, Ai Choo Kang, Tracy Merlin, Gaynor Parfitt, Nicole L Pratt, Debra Rowett, Stacey Torode and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Renly LimQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia renly.lim@unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-2523
Luke BereznickiSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Megan CorlisHelping Hand Aged Care, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lisa M Kalisch EllettQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ai Choo KangSouthern Cross Care (SA&NT), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tracy MerlinDiscipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Gaynor ParfittUniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Nicole L PrattQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Debra RowettUniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Stacey TorodeSouthern Cross Care (SA&NT), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Joseph WhitehousePharmacy Improvement Centre Ltd, Welland, South Australia, Australia.
Andre Q AndradeQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Rebecca BiltonQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Justin CousinsSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Lan KellyQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Camille SchubertDiscipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Mackenzie WilliamsUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Elizabeth Ellen RougheadQuality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
University of South Australia · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany medicines have adverse effects which are difficult to detect and frequently go unrecognised. Pharmacist monitoring of changes in signs and symptoms of these adverse effects, which we describe as medicine-induced deterioration, may reduce the risk of developing frailty. The aim of this trial is to determine the effectiveness of a 12-month pharmacist service compared with usual care in reducing medicine-induced deterioration, frailty and adverse reactions in older people living in aged-care facilities in Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The reducing medicine-induced deterioration and adverse reactions trial is a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Participants will be recruited from 39 facilities in South Australia and Tasmania. Residents will be included if they are using four or more medicines at the time of recruitment, or taking more than one medicine with anticholinergic or sedative properties. The intervention group will receive a pharmacist assessment which occurs every 8 weeks. The pharmacists will liaise with the participants' general practitioners when medicine-induced deterioration is evident or adverse events are considered serious. The primary outcome is a reduction in medicine-induced deterioration from baseline to 6 and 12 months, as measured by change in frailty index. The secondary outcomes are changes in cognition scores, 24-hour movement behaviour, grip strength, weight, percentage robust, pre-frail and frail classification, rate of adverse medicine events, health-related quality of life and health resource use. The statistical analysis will use mixed-models adjusted for baseline to account for repeated outcome measures. A health economic evaluation will be conducted following trial completion using data collected during the trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approvals have been obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of University of South Australia (ID:0000036440) and University of Tasmania (ID:H0017022). A copy of the final report will be provided to the Australian Government Department of Health. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry ACTRN12618000766213.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFrailtyHomes for the AgedMedication Therapy ManagementAgedBody WeightCognitionHand StrengthHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPhysical Functional PerformancePolypharmacyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicadverse drug eventscognitionnursing homespharmacistphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID32327474
PMCPMC7204916
OpenAlexW3019097219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.