Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32327440›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2020

Development and validation of an early pregnancy risk score for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women.

Si Gao, Junhong Leng, Hongyan Liu, Shuo Wang, Weiqin Li, Yue Wang, Gang Hu, Juliana C N Chan, Zhijie Yu, Hong Zhu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Simplified Screening Model to Predict the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnant Chinese Women.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Si Gao *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Junhong Leng *Department of Child Health, Tianjin Women and Children's Health Center, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-0830
Hongyan LiuDepartment of Child Health, Tianjin Women and Children's Health Center, Tianjin, China.
Shuo WangProject Office, Tianjin Women and Children's Health Center, Tianjin, China.
Weiqin LiProject Office, Tianjin Women and Children's Health Center, Tianjin, China.
Yue WangDepartment of Child Health, Tianjin Women and Children's Health Center, Tianjin, China.
Gang HuChronic Disease Epidemiology Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6172-8017
Juliana C N ChanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital-International Diabetes Federation Centre of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhijie YuPopulation Cancer Research Program and Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Hong ZhuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China zhuhong@tmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0501-1211
Xilin Yang *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Children's Hospital · CNFaculty of Public Health · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HKDalhousie University · CAPennington Biomedical Research Center · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI JUDD E SHELLITO · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a set of risk scores for the prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) before the 15th gestational week using an established population-based prospective cohort.

methodsFrom October 2010 to August 2012, 19 331 eligible pregnant women were registered in the three-tiered antenatal care network in Tianjin, China, to receive their antenatal care and a two-step GDM screening. The whole dataset was randomly divided into a training dataset (for development of the risk score) and a test dataset (for validation of performance of the risk score). Logistic regression was performed to obtain coefficients of selected predictors for GDM in the training dataset. Calibration was estimated using Hosmer-Lemeshow test, while discrimination was checked using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the test dataset.

resultsIn the training dataset (total=12 887, GDM=979 or 7.6%), two risk scores were developed, one only including predictors collected at the first antenatal care visit for early prediction of GDM, like maternal age, body mass index, height, family history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, and alanine aminotransferase; and the other also including predictors collected during pregnancy, that is, at the time of GDM screening, like physical activity, sitting time at home, passive smoking, and weight gain, for maximum performance. In the test dataset (total=6444, GDM=506 or 7.9%), the calibrations of both risk scores were acceptable (both p for Hosmer-Lemeshow test >0.25). The AUCs of the first and second risk scores were 0.710 (95% CI: 0.680 to 0.741) and 0.712 (95% CI: 0.682 to 0.743), respectively (p for difference: 0.9273).

conclusionBoth developed risk scores had adequate performance for the prediction of GDM in Chinese pregnant women in Tianjin, China. Further validations are needed to evaluate their performance in other populations and using different methods to identify GDM cases.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalChinaFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleProspective StudiesRisk Factorsbehavioral interventionsepidemiologygestational diabetes mellitusrisk factor modeling

Identifiers

PMID32327440
PMCPMC7202751
OpenAlexW3017451846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.