Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32327438›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2020

Spatial Resolution and the Magnitude of Infarct Volume Measurement Error in DWI in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

J M Ospel, A Jaffray, V Schulze-Zachau, S Kozerke, C Federau

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AFrontiers in neurology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

J M OspelFrom the Department of Radiology (J.M.O., V.S.-Z., C.F.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0029-6764
A JaffrayInstitute for Biomedical Engineering (A.J., S.K., C.F.), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9571-1838
V Schulze-ZachauFrom the Department of Radiology (J.M.O., V.S.-Z., C.F.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0945-8379
S KozerkeInstitute for Biomedical Engineering (A.J., S.K., C.F.), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-8884
C FederauFrom the Department of Radiology (J.M.O., V.S.-Z., C.F.), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland christian.federau@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3803-6602
University of Basel · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeInfarct volume in acute ischemic stroke is an important prognostic marker and determines endovascular treatment decisions. This study evaluates the magnitude and potential clinical impact of the error related to partial volume effects in infarct volume measurement on diffusion-weighted MR imaging in acute stroke and explores how increasing spatial resolution could reduce this error. MATERIALS AND

methodsDiffusion-weighted imaging of 393 patients with acute stroke, of whom 56 had anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion, was coregistered to standard space. Lesion boundaries were manually segmented. A 3D lesion-volume model was resampled for voxel sizes from 4 × 4 × 8 to 1 × 1 × 2 mm, and the surface-volume, corresponding to the partial volume error, was calculated. The number of cases with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion, in which the endovascular therapy core threshold of 70 mL was contained within the margin of error, was calculated as a function of imaging resolution.

resultsThe mean infarct core volume was 27.2 ± 49.9 mL. The mean surface volume was 14.7 ± 20.8 mL for 2 × 2 × 4 mm resolution and 7.4 ± 10.7 mL for 1 × 1 × 2 mm resolution. With a resolution of 2 × 2 × 4 mm, 70 mL was contained within the margin of error in 7/56 cases (12.5%) with large-vessel occlusion, while with a 1 × 1 × 2 mm voxel size, the margin of error was 3/56 (5%). The lesion-volume range of potentially misclassified lesions dropped from 46.5-94.1 mL for a 2 × 2 × 4 mm resolution to 64.4-80.1 mL for a 1 × 1 × 2 mm resolution.

conclusionsPartial volume effect is an important source of error in infarct volume measurement in acute stroke. Increasing spatial resolution substantially decreases the mean error. Standard use of high-resolution DWI should be considered to increase the reliability of infarct volume measurements.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAgedBrain InfarctionDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID32327438
PMCPMC7228151
OpenAlexW3020193772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.