Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326983›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2020

Examining the impact of a social skills training program on preschoolers' social behaviors: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in child care centers.

Marie-Pier Larose, Isabelle Ouellet-Morin, Francis Vergunst, Frank Vitaro, Alain Girard, Richard E Tremblay, Mara Brendgen, Sylvana M Côté

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie-Pier LaroseUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Isabelle Ouellet-MorinUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Francis VergunstUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Frank VitaroUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Alain GirardUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Richard E TremblayUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Mara BrendgenUniversité du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Sylvana M CôtéUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. sylvana.cote.1@umontreal.ca.
Université de Montréal · CAUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA) MOP: 114984Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine #6483Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture 2015-RG-178735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreschoolers regularly display disruptive behaviors in child care settings because they have not yet developed the social skills necessary to interact prosocially with others. Disruptive behaviors interfere with daily routines and can lead to conflict with peers and educators. We investigated the impact of a social skills training program led by childcare educators on children's social behaviors and tested whether the impact varied according to the child's sex and family socio-economic status.

methodsNineteen public Child Care Centers (CCC, n = 361 children) located in low socio-economic neighborhoods of Montreal, Canada, were randomized into one of two conditions: 1) intervention (n = 10 CCC; 185 children) or 2) wait list control (n = 9 CCC; 176 children). Educators rated children's behaviors (i.e., disruptive and prosocial behaviors) before and after the intervention. Hierarchical linear mixed models were used to account for the nested structure of the data.

resultsAt pre-intervention, no differences in disruptive and prosocial behaviors were observed between the experimental conditions. At post-intervention, we found a significant sex by intervention interaction (β intervention by sex = - 1.19, p = 0.04) indicating that girls in the intervention condition exhibited lower levels of disruptive behaviors compared to girls in the control condition (f2 effect size = - 0.15). There was no effect of the intervention for boys.

conclusionsGirls may benefit more than boys from social skills training offered in the child care context. Studies with larger sample sizes and greater intervention intensity are needed to confirm the results.

trial registrationCurrent clinical trial number is ISRCTN84339956 (Retrospectively registered in March 2017). No amendment to initial protocol.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorChild Day Care CentersEducationSocial BehaviorSocial SkillsCanadaChild CareChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleProblem BehaviorChildcare-based interventionChild developmentEarly childhood educationProblem behaviorSocial skills

Identifiers

PMID32326983
PMCPMC7181512
OpenAlexW3018169181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.