Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326960›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2020

Modified entropy-based procedure detects gene-gene-interactions in unconventional genetic models.

Jörg Malten, Inke R König

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jörg MaltenInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Inke R KönigInstitut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany. inke.koenig@uni-luebeck.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0504-6465

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KO2240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince it is assumed that genetic interactions play an important role in understanding the mechanisms of complex diseases, different statistical approaches have been suggested in recent years for this task. One interesting approach is the entropy-based IGENT method by Kwon et al. that promises an efficient detection of main effects and interaction effects simultaneously. However, a modification is required if the aim is to only detect interaction effects.

methodsBased on the IGENT method, we present a modification that leads to a conditional mutual information based approach under the condition of linkage equilibrium. The modified estimator is investigated in a comprehensive simulation based on five genetic interaction models and applied to real data from the genome-wide association study by the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC).

resultsThe presented modification of IGENT controls the type I error in all simulated constellations. Furthermore, it provides high power for detecting pure interactions specifically on unconventional genetic models both in simulation and real data.

conclusionsThe proposed method uses the IGENT software, which is free available, simple and fast, and detects pure interactions on unconventional genetic models. Our results demonstrate that this modification is an attractive complement to established analysis methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEpistasis, GeneticGenetic MarkersModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideArthritis, RheumatoidComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEntropyGenotypeHumansGenetic MarkersEntropyGene-gene-interactionsIGENT

Identifiers

PMID32326960
PMCPMC7181579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.