Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326959›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020

High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients.

Kenneth E Remy, John C Lin, Philip A Verhoef

Open access · goldAbstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Noninvasive Ventilation and Oxygenation Strategies.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Ventilatory Support in Patients with COVID-19.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Modified Barrier Enclosure for Noninvasive Respiratory Support in COVID-19 Outbreak.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth E RemyPediatrics and Internal Medicine, Adult and Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
John C LinDivision of Pediatrics and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Philip A VerhoefUniversity of Hawaii-Manoa, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA. Philip.verhoef@gmail.com.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

Impact of Red Blood Cell (RBC)-Derived DAMPs on Host Immune Response in Pediatric SepsisK08GM129763 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI REMY, KENNETH EUGENE · 2018 to 2021
$714k
NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM129763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CoronavirusNoninvasive VentilationSepsisBetacoronavirusCannulaCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Critical IllnessHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPositive-Pressure RespirationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32326959
PMCPMC7179373
OpenAlexW3018552505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.