Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326915›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

What is the impact of psychiatric decision units on mental health crisis care pathways? Protocol for an interrupted time series analysis with a synthetic control study.

L P Goldsmith, J G Smith, G Clarke, K Anderson, J Lomani, K Turner, S Gillard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L P GoldsmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK. lgoldsmi@sgul.ac.uk.
J G SmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
G ClarkeThe Health Foundation, 8 Salisbury Square, London, UK.
K AndersonPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
J LomaniPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
K TurnerPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
S GillardPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, London, SW17 0RE, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research 17/49/70
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe UK mental health system is stretched to breaking point. Individuals presenting with mental health problems wait longer at the ED than those presenting with physical concerns and finding a bed when needed is difficult - 91% of psychiatric wards are operating at above the recommended occupancy rate. To address the pressure, a new type of facility - psychiatric decision units (also known as mental health decision units) - have been introduced in some areas. These are short-stay facilities, available upon referral, targeted to help individuals who may be able to avoid an inpatient admission or lengthy ED visit. To advance knowledge about the effectiveness of this service for this purpose, we will examine the effect of the service on the mental health crisis care pathway over a 4-year time period; the 2 years proceeding and following the introduction of the service. We use aggregate service level data of key indicators of the performance of this pathway.

methodsData from four mental health Trusts in England will be analysed using an interrupted time series (ITS) design with the primary outcomes of the rate of (i) ED psychiatric presentations and (ii) voluntary admissions to mental health wards. This will be supplemented with a synthetic control study with the same primary outcomes, in which a comparable control group is generated for each outcome using a donor pool of suitable National Health Service Trusts in England. The methods are well suited to an evaluation of an intervention at a service delivery level targeting population-level health outcome and the randomisation or 'trialability' of the intervention is limited. The synthetic control study controls for national trends over time, increasing our confidence in the results. The study has been designed and will be carried out with the involvement of service users and carers. DISCUSSION: This will be the first formal evaluation of psychiatric decision units in England. The analysis will provide estimates of the effect of the decision units on a number of important service use indicators, providing much-needed information for those designing service pathways.

trial registrationprimary registry: isrctn.com Identifying number: ISRCTN77588384 Link: Date of registration in primary registry: 27/02/2020. PRIMARY SPONSOR: St George's, University of London, Cramner Road, Tooting, SW17 ORE. Primary contact: Joe Montebello.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingMental HealthEnglandHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMental DisordersPatient AdmissionState MedicineInterrupted time seriesMental health crisisPsychiatric decision unit, emergency department, crisis management, inpatient alternatives, psychiatric crisisService parametersService pathwaysSynthetic control

Identifiers

PMID32326915
PMCPMC7178744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.