Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326900›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2020

Health workers' views on factors affecting caregiver engagement with bubble CPAP.

Sangwani Salimu, Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Marianne Vidler, Mwai Banda, Laura Newberry, Queen Dube, Elizabeth M Molyneux, David M Goldfarb, Kondwani Kawaza, Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sangwani SalimuDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. ssalimu@mlw.mw.
Mai-Lei Woo KinshellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Mwai BandaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Laura NewberryDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Queen DubeQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Pediatrics, Blantyre, Malawi.
Elizabeth M MolyneuxDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
David M GoldfarbDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's and Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kondwani KawazaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Alinane Linda Nyondo-MipandoDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
University of Malawi · MWUniversity of British Columbia · CAQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital · MW

Funding

Malawi HIV Implementation Research Scientist Training Program (MHIRST)D43TW010060 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MINA CHRISTINE HOSSEINIPOUR, Victor Mwapasa · 2015 to 2026
$3.8M
Canadian Institutes for Health ResearchFIC NIH HHS D43 TW010060Global Affairs Canada IMCHA #108030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere respiratory distress is a leading cause of mortality among neonates in Malawi. Despite evidence on the safety, cost effectiveness and efficacy of bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in managing the condition, its use in Malawian health facilities is limited and little is known about caregivers' engagement with perspectives of bubble CPAP. The purpose of this study was to explore caregiver perspectives for bubble CPAP at both central and district hospitals and key factors that enable effective caregiver engagement in Malawi.

methodsThis was a descriptive qualitative study employing secondary analysis of 46 health care worker in-depth interviews. We interviewed the health workers about their thoughts on caregiver perspectives regarding use of bubble CPAP. We implemented the study at a tertiary facility and three district hospitals in southern Malawi. This was a part of a larger study to understand barriers and facilitators to implementing neonatal innovations in resource-constrained hospitals. Interviews were thematically analysed in NVivo 12 software (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia). Health workers were purposively selected to include nurses, clinicians and district health management involved in the use of bubble CPAP.

resultsEmerging issues included caregiver fears around bubble CPAP equipment as potentially harmful to their new-borns and how inadequate information provided to caregivers exacerbated knowledge gaps and was associated with refusal of care. However, good communication between health care providers and caregivers was associated with acceptance of care. Caregivers' decision-making was influenced by relatives and peer advocates were helpful in supporting caregivers and alleviating fears or misconceptions about bubble CPAP.

conclusionsSince caregivers turn to relatives and peers for support, there is need to ensure that both relatives and peers are counselled on bubble CPAP for improved understanding and uptake. Health workers need to provide simplified, accurate, up-to-date information on the intervention as per caregivers' level of understanding. Notably, contextualised comprehensible information will help alleviate caregivers' fear and anxieties about bubble CPAP.

Indexed as

CaregiversContinuous Positive Airway PressureAustraliaHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornMalawiBubble CPAPCaregiverMalawiNeonatesPeersPerspectives

Identifiers

PMID32326900
PMCPMC7179004
OpenAlexW3019023836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.