Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326874›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2020

Three-Dimensional Extrusion Printing of Porous Scaffolds Using Storable Ceramic Inks.

Luis Diaz-Gomez, Maryam E Elizondo, Panayiotis D Kontoyiannis, Gerry L Koons, Bruno Dacunha-Marinho, Xiang Zhang, Pulickel Ajayan, John A Jansen, Anthony J Melchiorri, Antonios G Mikos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luis Diaz-GomezDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Maryam E ElizondoDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Panayiotis D KontoyiannisDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gerry L KoonsDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Bruno Dacunha-MarinhoUnidade de Raios X, RIAIDT, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Xiang ZhangDepartment of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Pulickel AjayanDepartment of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
John A JansenDepartment of Biomaterials, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Anthony J MelchiorriDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Antonios G MikosDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Rice University · USUnited States Department of Health and Human Services · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we describe the additive manufacturing of porous three-dimensionally (3D) printed ceramic scaffolds prepared with hydroxyapatite (HA), β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), or the combination of both with an extrusion-based process. The scaffolds were printed using a novel ceramic-based ink with reproducible printability and storability properties. After sintering at 1200°C, the scaffolds were characterized in terms of structure, mechanical properties, and dissolution in aqueous medium. Microcomputed tomography and scanning electron microscopy analyses revealed that the structure of the scaffolds, and more specifically, pore size, porosity, and isotropic dimensions were not significantly affected by the sintering process, resulting in scaffolds that closely replicate the original dimensions of the 3D model design. The mechanical properties of the sintered scaffolds were in the range of human trabecular bone for all compositions. All ceramic bioinks showed consistent printability over a span of 14 days, demonstrating the short-term storability of the formulations. Finally, the mass loss did not vary among the evaluated compositions over a period of 28 days except in the case of β-TCP scaffolds, in which the structural integrity was significantly affected after 28 days of incubation in phosphate-buffered saline. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the development of storable ceramic inks for the 3D printing of scaffolds of HA, β-TCP, and mixtures thereof with high fidelity and low shrinkage following sintering that could potentially be used for bone tissue engineering in load-bearing applications.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesCalcium PhosphatesCeramicsDurapatiteHumansMaterials TestingPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffoldsbeta-tricalcium phosphateBone SubstitutesCalcium PhosphatesDurapatite3D printingbone regenerationcalcium phosphateceramic inkhydroxyapatitesintering

Identifiers

PMID32326874
PMCPMC7310315
OpenAlexW3020409279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.