Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326861›Full record

ReviewJournal of feline medicine and surgery2020

Ingo Schäfer, Barbara Kohn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Efficacy of RevolutionParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. First Report ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Detection ofVeterinary medicine international · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vector-Borne Pathogens in Stray Cats in Eastern Germany (Thuringia).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  16. Serological Analysis of IgG and IgM Antibodies againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  17. Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingo SchäferFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Small Animals, Freie Universität Berlin, Oertzenweg 19b, Building 1, 14163 Berlin, Germany.
Barbara KohnFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Clinic for Small Animals, Freie Universität Berlin, Oertzenweg 19b, Building 1, 14163 Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

practical relevanceGranulocytic anaplasmosis is a disease in humans and animals caused by the Gram-negative bacterium GLOBAL IMPORTANCE:

aimThe aim of this review is to give an overview of the published data and summarise the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical signs and therapy of feline granulocytic anaplasmosis. As clinical signs are vague and non-specific, this review aims to raise awareness of EVIDENCE BASE: Sixteen publications describing 55 cats have been reviewed. Thirty-four cats were well diagnosed based on guidelines of the European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases and blood analyses were performed to varying extents for these cats. Because of the limited number of studies and a lack of knowledge in cats, clinical signs and blood analyses are compared with available data in dogs.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumCat DiseasesEhrlichiosisAnimalsCatsTick InfestationsAnaplasma phagocytophilumanaplasmosisgranulocytic anaplasmosisvector-bornezoonosis

Identifiers

PMID32326861
PMCPMC7787687
OpenAlexW3019092017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.