Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326623›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Automatic and Controlled Processing: Implications for Eating Behavior.

Sophia Fürtjes, Joseph A King, Caspar Goeke, Maria Seidel, Thomas Goschke, Annette Horstmann, Stefan Ehrlich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophia FürtjesDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Joseph A KingDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Caspar GoekeInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany.
Maria SeidelDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Thomas GoschkeDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Annette HorstmannDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland.
Stefan EhrlichDivision of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DEOsnabrück University · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a widely held view that humans have control over their food choices and consumption. However, research also suggests that eating behavior is often triggered by contextual cues and guided by automaticities and habits. Interestingly, the dichotomy between automatic and controlled processing has recently been challenged, suggesting that they may be intertwined. In a large female sample (

Indexed as

CuesHabitsAdolescentAdultEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMiddle AgedSelf-ControlYoung Adultautomaticitycognitive controlcontext-specific proportion congruenteating behaviorhabitself-control

Identifiers

PMID32326623
PMCPMC7230536
OpenAlexW3016689787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.