Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326559›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Jordan M Cloyd, Victor Heh, Timothy M Pawlik, Aslam Ejaz, Mary Dillhoff, Allan Tsung, Terence Williams, Laith Abushahin, John F P Bridges, Heena Santry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Patient experience and quality of life during neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and study protocol.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Spatial Configuration of Pancreatic Cancer Is Associated with Disease Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative-Intent Resection.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordan M CloydDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Victor HehDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Timothy M PawlikDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Aslam EjazDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1387-2604
Mary DillhoffDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Allan TsungDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Terence WilliamsRadiation Oncology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Laith AbushahinInternal Medicine, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
John F P BridgesBiomedical Informatics, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Heena SantryDivision of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) versus surgery first (SF) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial. A random-effects meta-analysis of only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NT versus SF for potentially resectable (PR) or borderline resectable (BR) PDAC was performed. Among six RCTs including 850 patients, 411 (48.3%) received NT and 439 (51.6%) SF. In all included trials, NT was gemcitabine-based: four using chemoradiation and two chemotherapy alone. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, NT resulted in improved overall survival (OS) compared to SF (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.86). This effect was independent of anatomic classification (PR: hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91; BR: HR 0.51 95% CI 0.28-0.93) or NT type (chemoradiation: HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98; chemotherapy alone: HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.87). Overall resection rate was similar (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.04, I

Indexed as

chemotherapyfolfirinoxpancreas cancerpancreatectomypancreatic cancerpreoperative therapyradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID32326559
PMCPMC7231310
OpenAlexW3017314211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.