Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326492›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2020

In Situ Gelling Ophthalmic Drug Delivery System for the Optimization of Diagnostic and Preoperative Mydriasis: In Vitro Drug Release, Cytotoxicity and Mydriasis Pharmacodynamics.

Pierre-Louis Destruel, Ni Zeng, Françoise Brignole-Baudouin, Sophie Douat, Johanne Seguin, Elodie Olivier, Melody Dutot, Patrice Rat, Sophie Dufaÿ, Amélie Dufaÿ-Wojcicki and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Design and evaluation ofDrug delivery · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors affecting onJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre-Louis DestruelUnither Développement Bordeaux, ZA Tech Espace, av Toussaint Catros, 33185 Le Haillan, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9016-1083
Ni ZengUnither Pharmaceuticals, 3-5 rue St-Georges, 75009 Paris, France.
Françoise Brignole-BaudouinUMR CNRS 8038-Chimie Toxicologie Analytique et Cellulaire, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2006-5384
Sophie DouatDépartement Recherche et Développement Pharmaceutique, Agence Générale des Equipements et Produits de Santé (AGEPS), AP-HP, 7 rue du fer à moulin, 75005 Paris, France.
Johanne SeguinUniversité de Paris, UTCBS, CNRS, INSERM, Faculté de Pharmacie, 4 av de l'observatoire, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5689-7046
Elodie OlivierUMR CNRS 8038-Chimie Toxicologie Analytique et Cellulaire, 75006 Paris, France.
Melody DutotUMR CNRS 8038-Chimie Toxicologie Analytique et Cellulaire, 75006 Paris, France.
Patrice RatUMR CNRS 8038-Chimie Toxicologie Analytique et Cellulaire, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1270-4761
Sophie DufaÿDépartement Recherche et Développement Pharmaceutique, Agence Générale des Equipements et Produits de Santé (AGEPS), AP-HP, 7 rue du fer à moulin, 75005 Paris, France.
Amélie Dufaÿ-WojcickiDépartement Recherche et Développement Pharmaceutique, Agence Générale des Equipements et Produits de Santé (AGEPS), AP-HP, 7 rue du fer à moulin, 75005 Paris, France.
Marc MauryUnither Pharmaceuticals, 3-5 rue St-Georges, 75009 Paris, France.
Nathalie MignetUniversité de Paris, UTCBS, CNRS, INSERM, Faculté de Pharmacie, 4 av de l'observatoire, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3323-2997
Vincent BoudyDépartement Recherche et Développement Pharmaceutique, Agence Générale des Equipements et Produits de Santé (AGEPS), AP-HP, 7 rue du fer à moulin, 75005 Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAgence France-Presse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mydriasis is required prior to many eye examinations and ophthalmic surgeries. Nowadays, phenylephrine hydrochloride (PHE) and tropicamide (TPC) are extensively used to induce mydriasis. Several pharmaceutic dosage forms of these two active ingredients have been described. However, no optimal therapeutic strategy has reached the market. The present work focuses on the formulation and evaluation of a mucoadhesive ion-activated in situ gelling delivery system based on gellan gum and hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) for the delivery of phenylephrine and tropicamide. First, in vitro drug release was studied to assess appropriate sustained drug delivery on the ocular surface region. Drug release mechanisms were explored and explained using mathematical modeling. Then, in situ gelling delivery systems were visualized using scanning electron microscopy illustrating the drug release phenomena involved. Afterward, cytotoxicity of the developed formulations was studied and compared with those of commercially available eye drops. Human epithelial corneal cells were used. Finally, mydriasis intensity and kinetic was investigated in vivo. Mydriasis pharmacodynamics was studied by non-invasive optical imaging on vigilant rabbits, allowing eye blinking and nasolacrimal drainage to occur physiologically. In situ gelling delivery systems mydriasis profiles exhibited a significant increase of intensity and duration compared with those of conventional eye drops. Efficient mydriasis was achieved following the administration of a single drop of in situ gel reducing the required amount of administered active ingredients by four- to eight-fold compared with classic eye drop regimen.

Indexed as

delivery systemdrug releasegellan gumin situ gellingmydriasisophthalmic

Identifiers

PMID32326492
PMCPMC7238180
OpenAlexW3017201806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.