Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326285›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Development and Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Self-Reported Generic Health Literacy in Adolescence.

Olga Maria Domanska, Torsten Michael Bollweg, Anne-Kathrin Loer, Christine Holmberg, Liane Schenk, Susanne Jordan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Social Media Influencers, Health Literacy, and Food Literacy: A Correlational Study Among Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Exploring pandemic-related health literacy among adolescents in Germany: a focus group study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olga Maria DomanskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2831-3351
Torsten Michael BollwegCentre for Prevention and Intervention in Childhood and Adolescence (CPI), Faculty of Educational Science, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0147-6890
Anne-Kathrin LoerDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3720-3739
Christine HolmbergInstitute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Liane SchenkInstitute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Susanne JordanDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0721-1604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health literacy is a promising approach to promoting health and preventing disease among children and adolescents. Promoting health literacy in early stages of life could contribute to reducing health inequalities. However, it is difficult to identify concrete needs for action as there are few age-adjusted measures to assess generic health literacy in young people. Our aim was to develop a multidimensional measure of health literacy in German to assess generic health literacy among 14- to 17-year-old adolescents, namely, the "Measurement of Health Literacy Among Adolescents Questionnaire" (MOHLAA-Q). The development process included two stages. Stage 1 comprised the development and validation using a literature review, two rounds of cognitive interviews, two focus groups and two rounds of expert assessments by health literacy experts. Stage 2 included a standard pretest (

Indexed as

Health LiteracySelf ReportAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesadolescentshealth literacyMOHLAA-Questionnairequestionnaireself-assessmentsubjective measurementvalidation

Identifiers

PMID32326285
PMCPMC7216216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.