ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Classifying Dysphagic Swallowing Sounds with Support Vector Machines.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Technological Advances in Dysphagia Screening: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Surface Electromyographic Activities of Submental and Infrahyoid Muscles: Comparisons Based on Residue, Penetration and Aspiration.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Article
- Novel Approach Combining Shallow Learning and Ensemble Learning for the Automated Detection of Swallowing Sounds in a Clinical Database.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- An effective detection method for wheat mold based on ultra weak luminescence.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Wearable technology use for the analysis and monitoring of functions related to feeding and communication.CoDAS · 2022Article
- Cluster Analysis of Urban Acoustic Environments on Barcelona Sensor Network Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Swallowing sounds from cervical auscultation include information related to the swallowing function. Several studies have been conducted on the screening tests of dysphagia. The literature shows a significant difference between the characteristics of swallowing sounds obtained from different subjects (e.g., healthy and dysphagic subjects; young and old adults). These studies demonstrate the usefulness of swallowing sounds during dysphagic screening. However, the degree of classification for dysphagia based on swallowing sounds has not been thoroughly studied. In this study, we investigate the use of machine learning for classifying swallowing sounds into various types, such as normal swallowing or mild, moderate, and severe dysphagia. In particular, swallowing sounds were recorded from patients with dysphagia. Support vector machines (SVMs) were trained using some features extracted from the obtained swallowing sounds. Moreover, the accuracy of the classification of swallowing sounds using the trained SVMs was evaluated via cross-validation techniques. In the two-class scenario, wherein the swallowing sounds were divided into two categories (viz. normal and dysphagic subjects), the maximum F-measure was 78.9%. In the four-class scenario, where the swallowing sounds were divided into four categories (viz. normal subject, and mild, moderate, and severe dysphagic subjects), the F-measure values for the classes were 65.6%, 53.1%, 51.1%, and 37.1%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.