Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32326207›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Metabolome Profiling Supports the Key Role of the Spike in Wheat Yield Performance.

Omar Vergara-Diaz, Thomas Vatter, Rubén Vicente, Toshihiro Obata, Maria Teresa Nieto-Taladriz, Nieves Aparicio, Shawn Carlisle Kefauver, Alisdair Fernie, José Luis Araus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. ExploringPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Plant biochemical genetics in the multiomics era.Journal of experimental botany · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Impacts of Nitrogen Deficiency on Wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Omar Vergara-DiazIntegrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7074-0774
Thomas VatterIntegrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7344-6351
Rubén VicenteIntegrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5469-2645
Toshihiro ObataMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Maria Teresa Nieto-TaladrizNational Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA), Ctra de la Coruña 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Nieves AparicioTechnological and Agrarian Institute of Castilla y León (ITACyL), Agricultural Research. Ctra Burgos km 119, 47041 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4518-3667
Shawn Carlisle KefauverIntegrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1687-1965
Alisdair FernieMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.
José Luis ArausIntegrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8866-2388
Universitat de Barcelona · ESMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology · DEInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ESInstituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the relevance of spike bracts in stress acclimation and contribution to wheat yield was recently revealed, the metabolome of this organ and its response to water stress is still unknown. The metabolite profiles of flag leaves, glumes and lemmas were characterized under contrasting field water regimes in five durum wheat cultivars. Water conditions during growth were characterized through spectral vegetation indices, canopy temperature and isotope composition. Spike bracts exhibited better coordination of carbon and nitrogen metabolisms than the flag leaves in terms of photorespiration, nitrogen assimilation and respiration paths. This coordination facilitated an accumulation of organic and amino acids in spike bracts, especially under water stress. The metabolomic response to water stress also involved an accumulation of antioxidant and drought tolerance related sugars, particularly in the spikes. Furthermore, certain cell wall, respiratory and protective metabolites were associated with genotypic outperformance and yield stability. In addition, grain yield was strongly predicted by leaf and spike bracts metabolomes independently. This study supports the role of the spike as a key organ during wheat grain filling, particularly under stress conditions and provides relevant information to explore new ways to improve wheat productivity including potential biomarkers for yield prediction.

Indexed as

MetabolomeMetabolomicsBiomassDehydrationDroughtsGenotypeNitrogenPlant LeavesPrincipal Component AnalysisRegression AnalysisTriticumNitrogengrain yieldLASSO regressionleafmetabolomespikewater stresswheat

Identifiers

PMID32326207
PMCPMC7226616
OpenAlexW3019965129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.