ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Choosing the Best Sensor Fusion Method: A Machine-Learning Approach.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical Data Fusion Algorithm for Multiple Wind Speed Sensors in Anemometer Tower.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the Unseen: A Survey of Multi-Sensor Fusion and the Role of Explainable AI (XAI) in Autonomous Vehicles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Survey on Sensor Failures in Autonomous Vehicles: Challenges and Solutions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Health, Security and Fire Safety Process Optimisation Using Intelligence at the Edge.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Handheld Device-Based Indoor Localization with Zero Infrastructure (HDIZI).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Review on Technologies for Localisation and Navigation in Autonomous Railway Maintenance Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Decentralized Sensor Fusion Scheme for Multi Sensorial Fault Resilient Pose Estimation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Improved Accuracy in Predicting the Best Sensor Fusion Architecture for Multiple Domains.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Sensor and Sensor Fusion Technology in Autonomous Vehicles: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-sensor fusion refers to methods used for combining information coming from several sensors (in some cases, different ones) with the aim to make one sensor compensate for the weaknesses of others or to improve the overall accuracy or the reliability of a decision-making process. Indeed, this area has made progress, and the combined use of several sensors has been so successful that many authors proposed variants of fusion methods, to the point that it is now hard to tell which of them is the best for a given set of sensors and a given application context. To address the issue of choosing an adequate fusion method, we recently proposed a machine-learning data-driven approach able to predict the best merging strategy. This approach uses a meta-data set with the Statistical signatures extracted from data sets of a particular domain, from which we train a prediction model. However, the mentioned work is restricted to the recognition of human activities. In this paper, we propose to extend our previous work to other very different contexts, such as gas detection and grammatical face expression identification, in order to test its generality. The extensions of the method are presented in this paper. Our experimental results show that our extended model predicts the best fusion method well for a given data set, making us able to claim a broad generality for our sensor fusion method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.