Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32325895›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

Role of Vacha (

Vineet Sharma, Rohit Sharma, DevNath Singh Gautam, Kamil Kuca, Eugenie Nepovimova, Natália Martins

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Phyto-pharmacological Potential ofRecent advances in food, nutrition & agriculture · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Untargeted Metabolomics and Bioactivities Assessment ofCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Role ofVeterinary world · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vineet SharmaDepartment of Rasa Shastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rohit SharmaDepartment of Rasa Shastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
DevNath Singh GautamDepartment of Rasa Shastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Kamil KucaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanskeho 62, 50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Eugenie NepovimovaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanskeho 62, 50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Natália MartinsFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Institute of Medical Sciences · INUniversity of Hradec Králové · CZUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vacha (

Indexed as

Acorus calamusclinical trialethnomedicinalmetabolic applicationneurologicalneuroprotectivepharmacological actionphytochemistrytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32325895
PMCPMC7230970
OpenAlexW3016572288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.