Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32325821›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Big Data Analytics and Structural Health Monitoring: A Statistical Pattern Recognition-Based Approach.

Alireza Entezami, Hassan Sarmadi, Behshid Behkamal, Stefano Mariani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alireza EntezamiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4864-2120
Hassan SarmadiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948944, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2985-091X
Behshid BehkamalDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948944, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3151-1885
Stefano MarianiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5111-9800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in sensor technologies and data acquisition systems opened up the era of big data in the field of structural health monitoring (SHM). Data-driven methods based on statistical pattern recognition provide outstanding opportunities to implement a long-term SHM strategy, by exploiting measured vibration data. However, their main limitation, due to big data or high-dimensional features, is linked to the complex and time-consuming procedures for feature extraction and/or statistical decision-making. To cope with this issue, in this article we propose a strategy based on autoregressive moving average (ARMA) modeling for feature extraction, and on an innovative hybrid divergence-based method for feature classification. Data relevant to a cable-stayed bridge are accounted for to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method. The results show that the offered hybrid divergence-based method, in conjunction with ARMA modeling, succeeds in detecting damage in cases strongly characterized by big data.

Indexed as

big dataKullback–Leibler divergencelarge-scale bridgesnearest neighborstatistical pattern recognitionstructural health monitoringtime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID32325821
PMCPMC7219663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.