Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32325744›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Insights on Ultrafiltration-Based Separation for the Purification and Quantification of Methotrexate in Nanocarriers.

Sara S Marques, Inês I Ramos, Sara R Fernandes, Luisa Barreiros, Sofia A C Lima, Salette Reis, M Rosário M Domingues, Marcela A Segundo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara S MarquesLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4386-850X
Inês I RamosLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Sara R FernandesLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Luisa BarreirosLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3481-5809
Sofia A C LimaLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8777-5877
Salette ReisLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
M Rosário M DominguesCentro de Espetrometria de Massa, Departamento de Química & QOPNA, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5357-3601
Marcela A SegundoLAQV, REQUIMTE, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-0214
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-402-022125Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/128398/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/130948/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/97540/2013Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/AMB/50017/2019Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/50006/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência CEECIND/01620/2017Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência UID/QUI/00062/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of encapsulation efficiency is a regulatory requirement for the characterization of drug delivery systems. However, the difficulties in efficiently separating nanomedicines from the free drug may compromise the achievement of accurate determinations. Herein, ultrafiltration was exploited as a separative strategy towards the evaluation of methotrexate (MTX) encapsulation efficiency in nanostructured lipid carriers and polymeric nanoparticles. The effect of experimental conditions such as pH and the amount of surfactant present in the ultrafiltration media was addressed aiming at the selection of suitable conditions for the effective purification of nanocarriers. MTX-loaded nanoparticles were then submitted to ultrafiltration and the portions remaining in the upper compartment of the filtering device and in the ultrafiltrate were collected and analyzed by HPLC-UV using a reversed-phase (C18) monolithic column. A short centrifugation time (5 min) was suitable for establishing the amount of encapsulated MTX in nanostructured lipid carriers, based on the assumption that the free MTX concentration was the same in the upper compartment and in the ultrafiltrate. The defined conditions allowed the efficient separation of nanocarriers from the free drug, with recoveries of >85% even when nanoparticles were present in cell culture media and in pig skin surrogate from permeation assays.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersNanoparticlesUltrafiltrationDrug CompoundingDrug Delivery SystemsMethotrexateTheranostic NanomedicineDrug CarriersMethotrexatedrug deliveryencapsulation efficiencypermeationseparative methodsultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID32325744
PMCPMC7221554
OpenAlexW3016272691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.