ArticleNutrients2020
Content Validation through Expert Judgement of an Instrument on the Nutritional Knowledge, Beliefs, and Habits of Pregnant Women.
Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an epilepsy self-management mobile health app framework: Content validity study results.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- GPT-4 generates accurate and readable patient education materials aligned with current oncological guidelines: A randomized assessment.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Development and validation of the Clinical Nursing Knowledge Questionnaire-15 (CNKQ-15) for assessing contraceptive knowledge among nurses.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Development and psychometric testing of a parental knowledge, attitude, and practices questionnaire on pentavalent vaccine safety.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Content Validity Assessment of a Virtual Patient-Based Learning Platform for TMD Education among Orofacial Pain Experts.Journal of dental education · 2026Article
- Article
- Exploring the awareness and integration of occupational therapy in medical practice: A study of medical doctors' awareness of occupational therapy in Türkiye.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- On the perspective of doctors' intention-a hybrid BYOD model.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of Tanzania's food literacy tool for adults: implications for healthy eating behaviours.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Comparative determination of factors affecting attitude level towards healthy nutrition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of Hindi Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale in University Nursing Students.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2024Article
- Predictors of Pregnancy Disclosure in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III Athletes.Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- Construction and Content Validation of Mobile Devices' Application Messages about Food and Nutrition for DM2 Older Adults.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Development of a core outcome set for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a Delphi study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Development of a core set of outcome measures to be applied toward breast cancer-related lymphedema core outcome domains.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Review
- Digital food behaviours, motivations, and delivery application usage among saudis during COVID-19: A mixed-methods study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Construction and validation of an instrument for event-related sterility of processed healthcare products.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024Article
- Validation of an instrument for assessing leprosy care in children and adolescents.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024Article
- The APISS Questionnaire: A New Tool to Assess the Epidemiology of Systemic Allergic Reactions to Bee Venom in Beekeepers.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to conduct content validation through expert judgement of an instrument which explores the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits during pregnancy. This is a psychometric study in which 14 experts participated in the evaluation of each of the questionnaire items, which were divided into two blocks according to the characteristics of sufficiency, clarity, coherence, and relevance. Fleiss' κ statistic was used to measure strength of agreement. A pre-test with 102 participants was conducted to measure the degree of understandability of the instrument. The strength of agreement obtained for each of the dimensions was almost perfect. For each pair of experts, strength of agreement ranged between substantial and almost perfect. Sufficiency was the characteristic of the questionnaire that obtained the highest values in the two blocks, and was also the most statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.