ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A New Thresholding Method for IR-UWB Radar-Based Detection Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Device Free Detection in Impulse Radio Ultrawide Bandwidth Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Optimal Central Frequency for Non-Contact Vital Sign Detection Using Monocycle UWB Radar.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we proposed a new thresholding method for impulse radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar-based detection applications by taking both the false alarm and miss-detection rates into consideration. The thresholding algorithm is the key point of the detection application, and there have been numerous studies on these developments. Most of these studies were related to the occurrence of false alarms, such as the constant false alarm rate algorithm (CFAR). However, very few studies have considered miss-detection, which is another crucial issue in detection applications. To mitigate this issue, our proposed algorithm considered miss-detection as well as the false alarms occurring during thresholding. In the proposed algorithm, a threshold is determined by combining a noise signal-based threshold, in which the focus point is the false alarm, with a target signal-based threshold, in which the focus point is a miss-detection, at a designed ratio. Therefore, a threshold can be determined based on the focus point by adjusting the designed ratio. In addition, the proposed algorithm can estimate the false alarm and miss-detection rates for the determined threshold, and thus, the threshold can be objectively set. Moreover, the proposed algorithm is better in terms of understanding the target signal for a given environment. A target signal can be affected by the clutter, installation height, and the angle of the radar, which are factors that noise-oriented algorithms do not consider. As the proposed algorithm analyzed the target signal, these factors were all considered. We analyzed the false alarm and miss-detection rates for the thresholds, which were determined by different combination ratios at various distances, and we experimentally verified the validity of the proposed algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.