ArticlePhysiological measurement2020
Development of hemorrhage identification model using non-invasive vital signs.
Article in Physiological measurement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Sepsis Phenotype in a Single-Center Cohort Covering 2010-2020: Evolution in Day 1-Day 3 Trajectory and Potential Prognostic Value.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2025Article
- Early Physiologic Numerical and Waveform Characteristics of Simulated Hemorrhagic Events With Healthy Volunteers Donating Blood.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Application of artificial neural network in daily prediction of bleeding in ICU patients treated with anti-thrombotic therapy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Intelligent Clinical Decision Support.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A Simple Cardiovascular Model for the Study of Hemorrhagic Shock.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEarly detection and timely management of bleeding is critical as failure to recognize physiologically significant bleeding is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Many such instances are detected late, even in highly monitored environments, contributing to delay in recognition and intervention. We propose a non-invasive early identification model to detect bleeding events using continuously collected photoplethysmography (PPG) and electrocardiography (ECG) waveforms. APPROACH: Fifty-nine York pigs undergoing fixed-rate, controlled hemorrhage were involved in this study and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression-based early detection model was developed and tested using PPG and ECG derived features. The output of the early detection model was a risk trajectory indicating the future probability of bleeding. MAIN
resultsOur proposed models were generally accurate in predicting bleeding with an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.92) and achieved an average time of 16.1 mins to detect 16.8% blood loss when a false alert rate of 1% was tolerated. Models developed on non-invasive data performed with similar discrimination and lead time to hemorrhage compared to models using invasive arterial blood pressure as monitoring data. SIGNIFICANCE: A bleed detection model using only non-invasive monitoring performs as well as those using invasive arterial pressure monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.