Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32325257›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2020

A multicentre, randomised trial comparing schedules of G-CSF (filgrastim) administration for primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in early stage breast cancer.

M Clemons, D Fergusson, D Simos, M Mates, A Robinson, N Califaretti, L Zibdawi, M Bahl, J Raphael, M F K Ibrahim and 11 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02428114 completednot on this map

A Multi Centre Study to Determine the Feasibility of Using an Integrated Consent Model to Compare Standard of Care Administration Schedules of G-CSF (Filgrastim) for Primary Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia in Early Stage Breast Cancer (React-G Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2015 to 2017Enrolled142ConditionsEarly Stage Breast Cancer
NCT02816164 phase4completednot on this map

A Multi Centre Study to Compare Administration Schedules of G-CSF (Filgrastim) for Primary Prophylaxis of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia in Early Stage Breast Cancer (REaCT-G2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRan2016 to 2019Enrolled324ConditionsEarly Stage Breast CancerArmsNeupogen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Personalized Management of Cytopenias in Chronic Liver Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment Strategies.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Real-world evaluation of supportive care using an electronic health record text-mining tool: G-CSF use in breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Neutrophil: The Underdog That Packs a Punch in the Fight against Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

M ClemonsDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. Electronic address: mclemons@toh.ca.
D FergussonDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
D SimosThe Stronach Regional Cancer Center, Newmarket, Canada.
M MatesCancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, Canada.
A RobinsonCancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, Canada.
N CalifarettiGrand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, Canada.
L ZibdawiThe Stronach Regional Cancer Center, Newmarket, Canada.
M BahlGrand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, Canada.
J RaphaelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada; Division of Medical Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, Western University, London, Canada.
M F K IbrahimThunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute, Thunder Bay, Canada.
R FernandesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada.
L PitreThe Northeast Cancer Centre, Sudbury, Canada.
O AseyevThunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute, Thunder Bay, Canada.
C StoberCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
L VandermeerCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
D SaundersCancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
B HuttonClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
R MallickClinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
G R PondMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
A AwanDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
J HiltonDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Cancer Therapeutics Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteOttawa Hospital · CAGrand River Hospital · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CAThunder Bay Regional Research Institute · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAMcMaster University · CANortheast Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal duration of filgrastim as primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis in early breast cancer patients is unknown, with 5, 7 or 10 days being commonly prescribed. This trial evaluates whether 5 days of filgrastim was non-inferior to 7/10 days. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this randomised, open-label trial, early breast cancer patients who were to receive filgrastim as primary FN prophylaxis were randomly allocated to 5 versus 7 versus 10 days of filgrastim for all chemotherapy cycles. A protocol amendment in November 2017 allowed subsequent patients (N = 324) to be randomised to either 5 or 7/10 days. The primary outcome was a composite of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisations. Secondary outcomes included chemotherapy dose reductions, delays and discontinuations. Analyses were carried out by per protocol (primary) and intention-to-treat, and the non-inferiority margin was set at 3% for the risk of having FN and/or hospitalisation per cycle of chemotherapy.

resultsPatients (N = 466) were randomised to receive 5 (184, 39.5%), or 7/10 (282, 60.5%) days of filgrastim. In our primary analysis, the difference in risk of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisation per cycle was -1.52% [95% confidence interval (CI): -3.22% to 0.19%] suggesting non-inferiority of a 5-day filgrastim schedule compared with 7/10-days. The difference in events per cycle for FN was 0.11% (95% CI: -1.05 to 1.27) while for treatment-related hospitalisations it was -1.68% (95% CI: -2.73% to -0.63%). The overall proportions of patients having at least one occurrence of either FN or treatment-related hospitalisation were 11.8% and 14.96% for the 5- and 7/10-day groups, respectively (risk difference: -3.17%, 95% CI: -9.51% to 3.18%).

conclusionFive days of filgrastim was non-inferior to 7/10 days. Given the cost and toxicity of this agent, 5 days should be considered standard of care. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02428114 and NCT02816164.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaFebrile NeutropeniaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant Proteinsbreast cancerfilgrastimsupportive care

Identifiers

PMID32325257
OpenAlexW3016716571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.