Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32325104›Full record

ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2020

Linking autoantigen properties to mechanisms of immunity.

J Daniel Griffin, Jimmy Y Song, Joshua O Sestak, Brandon J DeKosky, Cory J Berkland

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Daniel GriffinBioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America.
Jimmy Y SongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America; Bioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America.
Joshua O SestakDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America; Orion BioScience, Inc, Omaha, NE, United States of America.
Brandon J DeKoskyBioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America; Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America.
Cory J BerklandBioengineering Graduate Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America; Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States of America. Electronic address: berkland@ku.edu.
University of Kansas · US

Funding

Protein Structure Laboratory P30GM110761 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI HANZLIK, ROBERT P · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
Comprehensive analysis of human adaptive immune receptors to elucidate correlates of Epstein-Barr virus disease suppressionDP5OD023118 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DEKOSKY, BRANDON JAMES · 2016 to 2022
$2.2M
Probing antigen specificity and response of autoimmune B cells in Neuromyelitis OpticaR21AI144408 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DEKOSKY, BRANDON JAMES · 2019 to 2020
$417k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI144408NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110761NIH HHS DP5 OD023118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antigen-specific immunotherapies (ASIT) present compelling potential for introducing precision to the treatment of autoimmune diseases where nonspecific, global immunosuppression is currently the only treatment option. Central to ASIT design is the delivery of autoantigen, which parallels allergy desensitization approaches. Clinical success in tolerizing allergen-specific responses spans longer than a century, but autoimmune ASITs have yet to see an FDA-approved breakthrough. Allergens and autoantigens differ substantially in physicochemical properties, and these discrepancies influence the nature of their interactions with the immune system. Approved allergen-specific immunotherapies are typically administered as water soluble, neutrally charged protein fractions from 10 to 70 kDa. Conversely, autoantigens are native proteins that exhibit wide-ranging sizes, solubilities, and charges that render them susceptible to immunogenicity. To translate the success of allergen hyposensitization to ASIT, delivery strategies may be necessary to effectively format autoantigens, guide biodistribution, and engage appropriate immune mechanisms.

Indexed as

AllergensAutoantigensAutoimmune DiseasesBiological TransportDesensitization, ImmunologicDrug Administration RoutesDrug Delivery SystemsHumansImmunotherapyAllergensAutoantigensAntigen-specific immunotherapyAutoantigenAutoimmune diseaseDrug deliveryImmunogenicityTransport

Identifiers

PMID32325104
PMCPMC7572523
OpenAlexW3017493685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.