Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32324822›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Response of the wood-decay fungus Schizophyllum commune to co-occurring microorganisms.

Katrin Krause, Elke-Martina Jung, Julia Lindner, Imam Hardiman, Jessica Poetschner, Soumya Madhavan, Christian Matthäus, Marco Kai, Riya Christina Menezes, Jürgen Popp and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Physio-Morphological Assessment and Multi-Omics Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Deciphering the Effect of Light Wavelengths inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What Role Might Non-Mating Receptors Play inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Katrin KrauseInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1336-8870
Elke-Martina JungInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Julia LindnerInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Imam HardimanInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Jessica PoetschnerInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Soumya MadhavanInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Christian MatthäusLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Jena, Germany.
Marco KaiResearch Group Mass Spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Riya Christina MenezesResearch Group Mass Spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Jürgen PoppLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Jena, Germany.
Aleš SvatošResearch Group Mass Spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Erika KotheInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms are constantly interacting in a given environment by a constant exchange of signaling molecules. In timber, wood-decay fungi will come into contact with other fungi and bacteria. In naturally bleached wood, dark, pigmented lines arising from confrontation of two fungi often hint at such interactions. The metabolites (and pigment) exchange was investigated using the lignicolous basidiomycete Schizophyllum commune, and co-occurring fungi and bacteria inoculated directly on sterilized wood, or on media. In interactions with competitive wood degrading fungi, yeasts or bacteria, different competition strategies and communication types were observed, and stress reactions, as well as competitor-induced enzymes or pigments were analyzed. Melanin, indole, flavonoids and carotenoids were shown to be induced in S. commune interactions. The induced genes included multi-copper oxidases lcc1, lcc2, mco1, mco2, mco3 and mco4, possibly involved in both pigment production and lignin degradation typical for wood bleaching by wood-decay fungi.

Indexed as

BacteriaPigments, BiologicalSchizophyllumSecondary MetabolismWoodPigments, Biological

Identifiers

PMID32324822
PMCPMC7179906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.