ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Learning action-oriented models through active inference.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conative inference as a mechanism of allostatic resilience: wanting to be and being to want.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Review
- Intermittent Active Inference.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Strange attractors: purpose, synchronicity, flow, and the neurodynamics of meaning.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Review
- Stabilizing the Convergence of Pixel-Based Deep Active Inference Controllers Using Adaptive Smoothing Filters.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Distributionally robust free energy principle for decision-making.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Resilience phenotypes derived from an active inference account of allostasis.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Dynamic Network Plasticity and Sample Efficiency in Biological Neural Cultures: A Comparative Study with Deep Reinforcement Learning.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Neuron-level Prediction and Noise can Implement Flexible Reward-Seeking Behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Post-injury pain and behaviour: a control theory perspective.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Reward Maximization Through Discrete Active Inference.Neural computation · 2023Article
- A neural active inference model of perceptual-motor learning.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Adversarial inference: predictive minds in the attention economy.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023Article
- A step-by-step tutorial on active inference and its application to empirical data.Journal of mathematical psychology · 2022Article
- Epistemic Communities under Active Inference.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?Physics of life reviews · 2022Review
- The evolution of brain architectures for predictive coding and active inference.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- The Problem of Meaning: The Free Energy Principle and Artificial Agency.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
- Piloting the Update: The Use of Therapeutic Relationship for Change - A Free Energy Account.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- From Generative Models to Generative Passages: A Computational Approach to (Neuro) Phenomenology.Review of philosophy and psychology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Converging theories suggest that organisms learn and exploit probabilistic models of their environment. However, it remains unclear how such models can be learned in practice. The open-ended complexity of natural environments means that it is generally infeasible for organisms to model their environment comprehensively. Alternatively, action-oriented models attempt to encode a parsimonious representation of adaptive agent-environment interactions. One approach to learning action-oriented models is to learn online in the presence of goal-directed behaviours. This constrains an agent to behaviourally relevant trajectories, reducing the diversity of the data a model need account for. Unfortunately, this approach can cause models to prematurely converge to sub-optimal solutions, through a process we refer to as a bad-bootstrap. Here, we exploit the normative framework of active inference to show that efficient action-oriented models can be learned by balancing goal-oriented and epistemic (information-seeking) behaviours in a principled manner. We illustrate our approach using a simple agent-based model of bacterial chemotaxis. We first demonstrate that learning via goal-directed behaviour indeed constrains models to behaviorally relevant aspects of the environment, but that this approach is prone to sub-optimal convergence. We then demonstrate that epistemic behaviours facilitate the construction of accurate and comprehensive models, but that these models are not tailored to any specific behavioural niche and are therefore less efficient in their use of data. Finally, we show that active inference agents learn models that are parsimonious, tailored to action, and which avoid bad bootstraps and sub-optimal convergence. Critically, our results indicate that models learned through active inference can support adaptive behaviour in spite of, and indeed because of, their departure from veridical representations of the environment. Our approach provides a principled method for learning adaptive models from limited interactions with an environment, highlighting a route to sample efficient learning algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.