ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2020
Predicting Bone Marrow Damage in the Skull After Clinical Transcranial MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound With Acoustic and Thermal Simulations.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A figure of merit for transcranial ultrasound transmission based on coupled elastic-thermal analysis.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Treatment envelope of transcranial histotripsy: challenges and strategies to maximize the treatment location profile.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Classical and Learned MR to Pseudo-CT Mappings for Accurate Transcranial Ultrasound Simulation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) thermal ablation is a noninvasive functional neurosurgery technique. Previous reports have shown that damage in the skull bone marrow can occur at high acoustic energies. While this damage is asymptomatic, it would be desirable to avoid it. Here we examined whether acoustic and thermal simulations can predict where the thermal lesions in the marrow occurred. Post-treatment imaging was obtained at 3-15 months after 40 clinical TcMRgFUS procedures, and bone marrow lesions were observed after 16 treatments. The presence of lesions was predicted by the acoustic energy with a threshold of 18.1-21.1 kJ (maximum acoustic energy used) and 97-112 kJ (total acoustic energy applied over the whole treatment). The size of the lesions was not always predicted by the acoustic energy used during treatment alone. In contrast, the locations, sizes, and shapes of the heated regions estimated by the acoustic and thermal simulations were qualitatively similar to those of the lesions. The lesions generally appeared in areas that were predicted to have high temperatures. While more work is needed to validate the temperature estimates in and around the skull, being able to predict the locations and onset for lesions in the bone marrow could allow for better distribution of the acoustic energy over the skull. Understanding skull absorption characteristics of TcMRgFUS could also be useful in optimizing transcranial focusing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.