Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32324497›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2020

Sex as a Biological Variable in Atherosclerosis.

Joshua J Man, Joshua A Beckman, Iris Z Jaffe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 233 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 367 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua J ManFrom the Molecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.J.M., I.Z.J.).
Joshua A BeckmanCardiovascular Division, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (J.A.B.).
Iris Z JaffeFrom the Molecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA (J.J.M., I.Z.J.).
Tufts Medical Center · USTufts University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of Vascular MR-Regulated Genes in Vascular Function and DiseaseR01HL095590 · NHLBI · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Iris Z Jaffe · 2009 to 2026
$7.7M
Smooth Muscle Mineralocorticoid Receptors in Vascular Aging and HypertensionR01HL119290 · NHLBI · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Iris Z Jaffe · 2014 to 2026
$7.0M
The Impact of Diabetes on Revascularization in BEST-CLIR01HL131977 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ADAY, AARON W., BECKMAN, JOSHUA A · 2016 to 2020
$4.0M
Role of the myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor in vascular inflammation in atherosclerosisF30HL152505 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI MAN, JOSHUA JAMES · 2020 to 2022
$144k
NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL152505NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095590NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119290NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory vascular disease and the predominant cause of heart attack and ischemic stroke. Despite the well-known sexual dimorphism in the incidence and complications of atherosclerosis, there are relatively limited data in the clinical and preclinical literature to rigorously address mechanisms underlying sex as a biological variable in atherosclerosis. In multiple histological and imaging studies, overall plaque burden and markers of inflammation appear to be greater in men than women and are predictive of cardiovascular events. However, while younger women are relatively protected from cardiovascular disease, by the seventh decade, the incidence of myocardial infarction in women ultimately surpasses that of men, suggesting an interaction between sex and age. Most preclinical studies in animal atherosclerosis models do not examine both sexes, and even in those that do, well-powered direct statistical comparisons for sex as an independent variable remain rare. This article reviews the available data. Overall, male animals appear to have more inflamed yet smaller plaques compared to female animals. Plaque inflammation is often used as a surrogate end point for plaque vulnerability in animals. The available data support the notion that rather than plaque size, plaque inflammation may be more relevant in assessing sex-specific mechanisms since the findings correlate with the sex difference in ischemic events and mortality and thus may be more reflective of the human condition. Overall, the number of preclinical studies directly comparing plaque inflammation between the sexes is extremely limited relative to the vast literature exploring atherosclerosis mechanisms. Failure to include both sexes and to address age in mechanistic atherosclerosis studies are missed opportunities to uncover underlying sex-specific mechanisms. Understanding the mechanisms driving sex as a biological variable in atherosclerotic disease is critical to future precision medicine strategies to mitigate what is still the leading cause of death of men and women worldwide.

Indexed as

ArteriesAtherosclerosisBiological Variation, PopulationHealth Status DisparitiesInflammationAdultAgedAge FactorsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlaque, Atheroscleroticatherosclerosiscardiovascular diseasesfemaleinflammationmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID32324497
PMCPMC7185045
OpenAlexW3018086681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.