Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32324144›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Rethinking Social Interaction: Empirical Model Development.

Jone Bjornestad, Christian Moltu, Marius Veseth, Tore Tjora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jone BjornestadDepartment of Social Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0381-1741
Christian MoltuDepartment of Psychiatry, District General Hospital of Førde, Førde, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3269-6383
Marius VesethDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5881-5451
Tore TjoraDepartment of Social Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4024-2288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media is an integral part of human social life. More than 90% of young people use social media daily. Current theories, models, and measures are primarily based on face-to-face conceptions, leaving research out of sync with current social trends. This may lead to imprecise diagnoses and predictions.

objectiveTo develop a theoretically based empirical model of current social interfaces to inform relevant measures.

methodsA three-stage, qualitative, data-collection approach included anonymous individual Post-it notes, three full-class discussions, and 10 focus groups to explore 82 adolescents' relational practices. Data analysis followed a meaning-condensation procedure and a field-correspondence technique.

resultsWe developed an empirical model that categorizes adolescents' social interactions into five experiential positions. Four positions result from trajectories relating to social media and face-to-face social interaction. Positions are described by match or mismatch dynamics between preferred and actual social platforms used. In matched positions, individuals prefer and use both face-to-face and social media platforms (position 1), prefer and use face-to-face platforms (position 2), or prefer and use social media platforms (position 3). In mismatched positions, individuals prefer face-to-face interactions but use social media platforms (position 4) or prefer social media but use face-to-face platforms (position 5). We propose that matched positions indicate good social functioning while mismatched positions indicate serious social challenges.

conclusionsWe propose a model that will expand previous unidimensional social interaction constructs, and we hypothesize that the described match and mismatch analyses provide conceptual clarity for research and practical application. We discuss prediction value, implications, and model validation procedures.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsResearch DesignAdolescentData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleSocial Mediaadolescenceempiricalhealth sciencemodelsocial functioningsocial interactionsocial media

Identifiers

PMID32324144
PMCPMC7206514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.