Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32324137›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Pre-stimulus phase and amplitude regulation of phase-locked responses are maximized in the critical state.

Arthur-Ervin Avramiea, Richard Hardstone, Jan-Matthis Lueckmann, Jan Bím, Huibert D Mansvelder, Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Critical Dynamics in the Association Cortex Predict Higher Intelligence in Typically Developing Children.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. DMT-Induced Shifts in Criticality Correlate with Self-Dissolution.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intrinsic dynamics and topography of sensory input systems.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  12. Rhythms in cognition: The evidence revisited.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Long-Range Amplitude Coupling Is Optimized for Brain Networks That Function at Criticality.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arthur-Ervin Avramiea *Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-8269
Richard Hardstone *Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7502-9145
Jan-Matthis LueckmannDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4320-4663
Jan BímDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2780-5610
Huibert D MansvelderDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1365-5340
Klaus Linkenkaer-HansenDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2140-9780

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 406.15.256Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 612.001.123Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 406.15.256Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 612.001.123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding why identical stimuli give differing neuronal responses and percepts is a central challenge in research on attention and consciousness. Ongoing oscillations reflect functional states that bias processing of incoming signals through amplitude and phase. It is not known, however, whether the effect of phase or amplitude on stimulus processing depends on the long-term global dynamics of the networks generating the oscillations. Here, we show, using a computational model, that the ability of networks to regulate stimulus response based on pre-stimulus activity requires near-critical dynamics-a dynamical state that emerges from networks with balanced excitation and inhibition, and that is characterized by scale-free fluctuations. We also find that networks exhibiting critical oscillations produce differing responses to the largest range of stimulus intensities. Thus, the brain may bring its dynamics close to the critical state whenever such network versatility is required.

Indexed as

BrainComputer SimulationHumansNerve NetNeuronsVisual Perceptioncritical brain dynamicsneuroscienceongoing oscillationsperceptionversatility

Identifiers

PMID32324137
PMCPMC7217696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.