Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32323820›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2020

Whole exome sequencing identified a pathogenic nonsense mutation in LMNA in a family with a progressive cardiac conduction defect: A case report.

Peng Fan, Di Zhang, Kun-Qi Yang, Tao Tian, Fang Luo, Ya-Xin Liu, Lin-Ping Wang, Xian-Liang Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng Fan *Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, P.R. China.
Di Zhang *Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, P.R. China.
Kun-Qi YangDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, P.R. China.
Tao TianDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, P.R. China.
Fang LuoDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, P.R. China.
Ya-Xin LiuDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, P.R. China.
Lin-Ping WangDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, P.R. China.
Xian-Liang ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, P.R. China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progressive cardiac conduction defect (PCCD) is an inherited autosomal dominant cardiac disorder characterized by an age‑dependent cardiac electrical conduction block. Several genes have been associated with the genetic pathogenesis of PCCD. The present study aimed to identify the causal mutation of PCCD and to investigate the association between genotype and phenotype in a Chinese family with PCCD. A total of 39 family members were included in the present study. All subjects participated in physical, biochemical, electrocardiography and echocardiography examinations. Whole‑exome sequencing was performed for four individuals from the same generation, including three patients with PCCD and one normal control with no cardiovascular disease. Sanger sequencing and in silico analysis were used to identify the causal mutation. Whole‑exome sequencing and variant identification revealed a candidate nonsense mutation (c.1443C>A, p.Tyr481*) in lamin A/C (LMNA). The mutation was identified in seven patients (including the proband) and two asymptomatic mutation carriers, but it was not detected in 100 control subjects of matched ancestry. Clinical examinations identified typical symptoms in patients with PCCD, including bradycardia and various types of conduction defect, and excluded other phenotypes related to the LMNA mutation. The genotype and phenotype were co‑associated among all participants. In the present study, the c.1443C>A mutation in the LMNA gene was identified as a potential cause of PCCD. In silico analysis predicted that the identified mutation was damaging through its effect on the lamin tail domain of LMNA. From the present study, it could be suggested that genetic screening and family counseling, early pacemaker implantation or a sudden death in the family may be essential for risk stratification and treatment of patients with PCCD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBase SequenceCardiac Conduction System DiseaseCodon, NonsenseElectrocardiographyExome SequencingFemaleGenotypeHeart BlockHumansLamin Type AMiddle AgedPedigreeProtein Structure, TertiaryCodon, NonsenseLamin Type Alamin a/cnonsense mutationprogressive cardiac conduction defect

Identifiers

PMID32323820
PMCPMC7185278
OpenAlexW3014726761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.