ArticleOncology reports2020
Patient‑derived orthotopic xenograft glioma models fail to replicate the magnetic resonance imaging features of the original patient tumor.
Article in Oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI and amino acid PET detection of whole-brain tumor burden.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Effect of 3D Slicer Preoperative Planning and Intraoperative Guidance with Mobile Phone Virtual Reality Technology on Brain Glioma Surgery.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Use of multimodality imaging, histology, and treatment feasibility to characterize a transgenicFrontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Contemporary Mouse Models in Glioma Research.Cells · 2021Review
- The impact of initial tumor microenvironment on imaging phenotype.Cancer treatment and research communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient‑derived orthotopic glioma xenograft models are important platforms used for pre‑clinical research of glioma. In the present study, the diagnostic ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was examined with regard to the identification of biomarkers obtained from patient‑derived glioma xenografts and human tumors. Conventional MRI, diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‑enhanced (DCE)‑MRI were used to analyze seven pairs of high grade gliomas with their corresponding xenografts obtained from non‑obese diabetic‑severe‑combined immunodeficiency nude mice. Tumor samples were collected for transcriptome sequencing and histopathological staining, and differentially expressed genes were screened between the original tumors and the corresponding xenografts. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed to predict the functions of these genes. In 6 cases of xenografts with diffuse growth, the degree of enhancement was significantly lower compared with the original tumors. Histopathological staining indicated that the microvascular area and microvascular diameter of the xenografts were significantly lower compared with the original tumors (P=0.009 and P=0.007, respectively). In one case, there was evidence of nodular tumor growth in the mouse. Both MRI and histopathological staining showed a clear demarcation between the transplanted tumors and the normal brain tissues. The relative apparent diffusion coefficient values of the 7 cases examined were significantly higher compared with the corresponding original tumors (P=0.001) and transfer coefficient values derived from DCE‑MRI of the tumor area was significantly lower compared with the original tumors (P=0.016). GO analysis indicated that the expression levels of extracellular matrix‑associated genes, angiogenesis‑associated genes and immune function‑associated genes in the original tumors were higher compared with the corresponding xenografts. In conclusion, the data demonstrated that the MRI features of patient‑derived xenograft glioma models in mice were different compared with those of the original patient tumors. Differential gene expression may underlie the differences noted in the MRI features between original tumors and corresponding xenografts. The results of the present study highlight the precautions that should be taken when extrapolating data from patient‑derived xenograft studies, and their applicability to humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.