Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32323803›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2020

N6‑methyladenosine RNA methylation regulators participate in malignant progression and have prognostic value in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Zongtai Zheng, Shiyu Mao, Yadong Guo, Wentao Zhang, Ji Liu, Cheng Li, Xudong Yao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. RNA NNature reviews. Urology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. mCancers · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. mFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zongtai ZhengDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P.R. China.
Shiyu MaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P.R. China.
Yadong GuoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P.R. China.
Wentao ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P.R. China.
Ji LiuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P.R. China.
Cheng LiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P.R. China.
Xudong YaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, P.R. China.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N6‑methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation is the most prevalent type of mRNA modification; however, little is known about its function in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The present study aimed to establish and validate a m6A‑related risk signature as a prognostic factor for patients with ccRCC. Consensus clustering was used to divide patients with ccRCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (n=489) into three clusters (cluster 1/2/3) based on 19 m6A RNA methylation regulators. In addition, a m6A‑related risk signature was constructed using TCGA data, and its accuracy was validated using data from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (n=91). The prognostic performance of the risk signature was evaluated by Kaplan‑Meier analyses, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression, multivariate Cox regression, receiver operating characteristic curves and nomograms. The results revealed that the majority of the 19 m6A RNA methylation regulators were differentially expressed among ccRCC stratified by different clinicopathological features. The cluster 1 group exhibited a higher frequency of metastasis and poorer overall survival compared with the cluster 2/cluster 3 group. The hallmarks of RNA metabolism, transcription misregulation in cancer and regulation of autophagy, were significantly enriched in the cluster 1 group. A m6A‑related risk signature was constructed and validated with high prognostic accuracy for the prediction of 5‑year survival and recurrence (area under the curve, 0.736 and 0.728, respectively). The present study also established robust nomograms for evaluating the risk of mortality and recurrence for patients with ccRCC (c‑index, 0.783 and 0.819, respectively). The dysregulation of hub m6A RNA methylation regulator expression levels and m6A RNA methylation levels were also validated in multiple RCC cells using in vitro experiments. Taken together, the m6A RNA methylation regulators promoted the malignant progression of ccRCC and exhibited good performance in prognostic predictions. These results provided insight into the development of m6A‑targeted treatments for ccRCC.

Indexed as

AdenosineBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCell Line, TumorDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingNomogramsSequence Analysis, RNASurvival AnalysisAdenosineBiomarkers, TumorN-methyladenosineccRCCm6Anomogramprognosisrisk signature

Identifiers

PMID32323803
PMCPMC7108075
OpenAlexW3007558625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.