Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32323722›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2021

The Health Inequalities Assessment Toolkit: supporting integration of equity into applied health research.

Ana Porroche-Escudero, Jennie Popay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana Porroche-EscuderoDivision of Health Research, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1YW.ORCID 0000-0002-2740-5273
Jennie PopayDivision of Health Research, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1YW.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite insistent calls for more and better evidence to inform action to reduce health inequities, applied health research sensitive to these inequalities is rare. Recognising this problem, the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Research and Care in the North West Coast (England) developed the Health Inequalities Assessment Toolkit (HIAT) to support those involved in health research to integrate equity into their work.

objectiveThis paper reports on an evaluation of the extent to which HIAT enhances the equity focus of the work of users.

methodsThe evaluation used semi-structured interviews, focus groups and workshops (n = 131 respondents including Public Advisers, university, NHS and local government partners). Routine data included HIAT feedback forms.

findingsHIAT can help to strengthen the equity focus of applied health research by: increasing understanding of how socioeconomic inequities impact on health; building capacity for integrating equity into all aspects of research, implementation and capacity building; stimulating thinking on action to address local structural drivers of health inequalities; and increasing understanding of the positive contribution public involvement can make to research.

conclusionIf we are to advance health equity goals delivering research and training needs to be combined with political commitment to create more equal societies.

Indexed as

Health EquityHealth Status DisparitiesCapacity BuildingFocus GroupsHealth PolicyHumansLocal Governmenthealth inequalitieshealth researchmainstreamingmedical educationsocial determinants of health inequities

Identifiers

PMID32323722
PMCPMC8458018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.