Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32323256›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound2020

Carpal tunnel sonography.

A Gervasio, C Stelitano, P Bollani, A Giardini, E Vanzetti, M Ferrari

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome During Pregnancy in Iran.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Carpal tunnel syndrome related to rheumatic disease (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Imaging diagnosis in peripheral nerve injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A GervasioRadiology Department, San Donato Hospital Group, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Via Bartolomeo Gualla 15, 25128, Brescia, Italy.
C StelitanoRadiology Institute, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Viale Camillo Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. chiarastelitano@gmail.com.
P BollaniRadiology Department, San Donato Hospital Group, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Via Bartolomeo Gualla 15, 25128, Brescia, Italy.
A GiardiniRadiology Department, San Donato Hospital Group, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Via Bartolomeo Gualla 15, 25128, Brescia, Italy.
E VanzettiRadiology Department, San Donato Hospital Group, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Via Bartolomeo Gualla 15, 25128, Brescia, Italy.
M FerrariRadiology Department, San Donato Hospital Group, Istituto Clinico Città di Brescia, Via Bartolomeo Gualla 15, 25128, Brescia, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most frequent entrapment neuropathy of peripheral nerves, with an incidence of 1-3 patients in 1000. CTS typically occurs between 45 and 60 years of age, and it is more frequent in women than in men. The main cause of CTS is chronic compression of the median nerve and ischemic suffering secondary to increased pressure in the carpal tunnel. There are many possible causes of CTS, which can be differentiated into idiopathic causes, which include most cases, and secondary causes. Classical CTS diagnosis is based on the patient's clinical examination and electrophysiological tests, such as electromyography and nerve conduction studies. The latter are helpful for determining the site of nerve compression, assessing its severity, monitoring the course of the disease after therapy, and excluding other causes of median nerve pain, such as cervical radiculopathies, brachial plexopathies, polyneuropathy, or other forms of mononeuropathies. However, clinical examination and electrophysiological tests are not able to differentiate idiopathic forms from secondary forms of CTS, and discrepancies are possible between clinical examination and electrophysiological tests (false negatives). Ultrasound examination is able to recognize most of the secondary forms of CTS. It can evaluate the morphological alterations of the nerve and correlate them with the severity of nerve suffering in all cases, even idiopathic ones, with a sensitivity and specificity equal to those of electrophysiological tests. It can also highlight some anatomical predisposing variants or conditions that may represent contraindications to minimally invasive treatments. Ultrasound examination also plays a fundamental role in evaluating patients with an unfavorable outcome after surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeHumansMedian NerveUltrasonographyCarpal tunnelCarpal tunnel syndromeEntrapment neuropathyMedian nerveSonography

Identifiers

PMID32323256
PMCPMC7441118
OpenAlexW3019927152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.