ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020
Acoustic signal analysis of instrument-tissue interaction for minimally invasive interventions.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Pooled it
- Vibroacoustic signatures: proof of concept for simple material characterization during needle interventions.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- A new sensing paradigm for the vibroacoustic detection of pedicle screw loosening.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- A Review of Needle Navigation Technologies in Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgeries-Toward a More Effective and Easy-to-Apply Process.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The sound of surgery-development of an acoustic trocar system enabling laparoscopic sound analysis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Medical Augmented Reality: Definition, Principle Components, Domain Modeling, and Design-Development-Validation Process.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
- Telemedical percussion: objectifying a fundamental clinical examination technique for telemedicine.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Review
- Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.Medical image analysis · 2022Review
- Intraoperative tissue classification methods in orthopedic and neurological surgeries: A systematic review.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- Real-time acoustic sensing and artificial intelligence for error prevention in orthopedic surgery.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become the standard for many surgical procedures as it minimizes trauma, reduces infection rates and shortens hospitalization. However, the manipulation of objects in the surgical workspace can be difficult due to the unintuitive handling of instruments and limited range of motion. Apart from the advantages of robot-assisted systems such as augmented view or improved dexterity, both robotic and MIS techniques introduce drawbacks such as limited haptic perception and their major reliance on visual perception.
methodsIn order to address the above-mentioned limitations, a perception study was conducted to investigate whether the transmission of intra-abdominal acoustic signals can potentially improve the perception during MIS. To investigate whether these acoustic signals can be used as a basis for further automated analysis, a large audio data set capturing the application of electrosurgery on different types of porcine tissue was acquired. A sliding window technique was applied to compute log-mel-spectrograms, which were fed to a pre-trained convolutional neural network for feature extraction. A fully connected layer was trained on the intermediate feature representation to classify instrument-tissue interaction.
resultsThe perception study revealed that acoustic feedback has potential to improve the perception during MIS and to serve as a basis for further automated analysis. The proposed classification pipeline yielded excellent performance for four types of instrument-tissue interaction (muscle, fascia, liver and fatty tissue) and achieved top-1 accuracies of up to 89.9%. Moreover, our model is able to distinguish electrosurgical operation modes with an overall classification accuracy of 86.40%.
conclusionOur proof-of-principle indicates great application potential for guidance systems in MIS, such as controlled tissue resection. Supported by a pilot perception study with surgeons, we believe that utilizing audio signals as an additional information channel has great potential to improve the surgical performance and to partly compensate the loss of haptic feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.