Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32323212›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Acoustic signal analysis of instrument-tissue interaction for minimally invasive interventions.

Daniel Ostler, Matthias Seibold, Jonas Fuchtmann, Nicole Samm, Hubertus Feussner, Dirk Wilhelm, Nassir Navab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Vibroacoustic signatures: proof of concept for simple material characterization during needle interventions.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The sound of surgery-development of an acoustic trocar system enabling laparoscopic sound analysis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Telemedical percussion: objectifying a fundamental clinical examination technique for telemedicine.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel OstlerMinimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. daniel.ostler@tum.de.
Matthias SeiboldMinimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. matthias.seibold@tum.de.
Jonas FuchtmannMinimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nicole SammMinimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hubertus FeussnerMinimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Dirk WilhelmMinimally Invasive Interdisciplinary Therapeutical Intervention, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nassir NavabChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become the standard for many surgical procedures as it minimizes trauma, reduces infection rates and shortens hospitalization. However, the manipulation of objects in the surgical workspace can be difficult due to the unintuitive handling of instruments and limited range of motion. Apart from the advantages of robot-assisted systems such as augmented view or improved dexterity, both robotic and MIS techniques introduce drawbacks such as limited haptic perception and their major reliance on visual perception.

methodsIn order to address the above-mentioned limitations, a perception study was conducted to investigate whether the transmission of intra-abdominal acoustic signals can potentially improve the perception during MIS. To investigate whether these acoustic signals can be used as a basis for further automated analysis, a large audio data set capturing the application of electrosurgery on different types of porcine tissue was acquired. A sliding window technique was applied to compute log-mel-spectrograms, which were fed to a pre-trained convolutional neural network for feature extraction. A fully connected layer was trained on the intermediate feature representation to classify instrument-tissue interaction.

resultsThe perception study revealed that acoustic feedback has potential to improve the perception during MIS and to serve as a basis for further automated analysis. The proposed classification pipeline yielded excellent performance for four types of instrument-tissue interaction (muscle, fascia, liver and fatty tissue) and achieved top-1 accuracies of up to 89.9%. Moreover, our model is able to distinguish electrosurgical operation modes with an overall classification accuracy of 86.40%.

conclusionOur proof-of-principle indicates great application potential for guidance systems in MIS, such as controlled tissue resection. Supported by a pilot perception study with surgeons, we believe that utilizing audio signals as an additional information channel has great potential to improve the surgical performance and to partly compensate the loss of haptic feedback.

Indexed as

AcousticsAnimalsFeedbackLiverMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresMuscle, SkeletalNeural Networks, ComputerRobotic Surgical ProceduresSwineAudio analysisAudio perceptionDeep learningMinimally invasive surgerySpectrogramVisceral surgery

Identifiers

PMID32323212
PMCPMC7261275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.