ArticleJournal of community health2020
Assessment of the Knowledge Level Regarding Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: Comparison Across Age Groups.
Article in Journal of community health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Literacy is Essential to ASCVD Prevention in Youth.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023Review
- Level of cardiovascular disease knowledge, risk perception and intention towards healthy lifestyle and socioeconomic disparities among adults in vulnerable communities of Belgium and England.BMC public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Varied education sources concerning cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors exist. This study was to assess the knowledge level of CVD risk factors across age groups and whether certain educational sources contributed to greater knowledge. Participant groups were those who had completed outpatient cardiac rehabilitation, general adults, college students, high school, and elementary school students. The survey consisted of demographics, sources of CVD risk factor information, and 11 questions assessing CVD risk factor knowledge. Relationships between survey data and score on the exam were explored with multiple regression, Chi-square, and t tests. 406 surveys were administered with 381 analyzed (93.8%). There were significant differences between groups' knowledge of CVD risk factors (p = 0.034) with college students knowing the most (88% correct) and elementary students the least (77%). Significant differences between groups existed for knowledge from formal education and mass media (p < 0.001), along with internet and family experience (p < 0.003). Family discussion had the greatest odds ratio for high level of knowledge (- 3.78). Age groups received CVD risk factor education from different sources leading to small, but significant differences in knowledge. Knowledge levels in this study were high over all age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32323174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.