Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32323103›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2020

Prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center phase II trial of two HER2 peptide vaccines, GP2 and AE37, in breast cancer patients to prevent recurrence.

Tommy A Brown, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Diane F Hale, John W Myers, Kaitlin M Peace, Doreen O Jackson, Julia M Greene, Timothy J Vreeland, G Travis Clifton, Alexandros Ardavanis and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer: Beyond Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Cancer vaccines: current status and future directions.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Tommy A BrownDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Elizabeth A MittendorfDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Diane F HaleDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
John W MyersDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Kaitlin M PeaceDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Doreen O JacksonDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Julia M GreeneDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Timothy J VreelandDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
G Travis CliftonDepartment of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Alexandros ArdavanisCancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, St. Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Jennifer K LittonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Nathan M ShumwayTexas Oncology PA, San Antonio, TX, USA.
J SymanowskiDepartment of Cancer Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.
James L MurrayDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sathibalan PonniahCancer Vaccine Development Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
E A AnastasopoulouCancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, St. Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
N F PistamaltzianCancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, St. Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Constantin N BaxevanisCancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, St. Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Sonia A PerezCancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, St. Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Michael PapamichailCancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, St. Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece.
George E PeoplesDepartment of Surgery, Uniformed Services Health University, Bethesda, MD, USA. gpeoples@cancerinsight.com.
San Antonio Military Medical Center · USSt Savas Hospital · GRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USLevine Cancer Institute · USTexas Oncology · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NIH HHS CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAE37 and GP2 are HER2 derived peptide vaccines. AE37 primarily elicits a CD4+ response while GP2 elicits a CD8+ response against the HER2 antigen. These peptides were tested in a large randomized trial to assess their ability to prevent recurrence in HER2 expressing breast cancer patients. The primary analyses found no difference in 5-year overall disease-free survival (DFS) but possible benefit in subgroups. Here, we present the final landmark analysis.

methodsIn this 4-arm, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center phase II trial, disease-free node positive and high-risk node negative breast cancer patients enrolled after standard of care therapy. Six monthly inoculations of vaccine (VG) vs. control (CG) were given as the primary vaccine series with 4 boosters at 6-month intervals. Demographic, safety, immunologic, and DFS data were evaluated.

results456 patients were enrolled; 154 patients in the VG and 147 in CG for AE37, 89 patients in the VG and 91 in CG for GP2. The AE37 arm had no difference in DFS as compared to CG, but pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses showed a trend towards benefit in advanced stage (p = 0.132, HR 0.573 CI 0.275-1.193), HER2 under-expression (p = 0.181, HR 0.756 CI 0.499-1.145), and triple-negative breast cancer (p = 0.266, HR 0.443 CI 0.114-1.717). In patients with both HER2 under-expression and advanced stage, there was significant benefit in the VG (p = 0.039, HR 0.375 CI 0.142-0.988) as compared to CG. The GP2 arm had no significant difference in DFS as compared to CG, but on subgroup analysis, HER2 positive patients had no recurrences with a trend toward improved DFS (p = 0.052) in VG as compared to CG.

conclusionsThis phase II trial reveals that AE37 and GP2 are safe and possibly associated with improved clinical outcomes of DFS in certain subgroups of breast cancer patients. With these findings, further evaluations are warranted of AE37 and GP2 vaccines given in combination and/or separately for specific subsets of breast cancer patients based on their disease biology.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPeptide FragmentsPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPeptide FragmentsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneVaccines, SubunitAE37Breast cancerGP2HER2ImmunotherapyVaccine

Identifiers

PMID32323103
PMCPMC7188712
OpenAlexW3019707411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.