Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32323098›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2020

Cortical processing to anorectal stimuli after rectal resection with and without radiotherapy.

S Haas, P M Faaborg, M Gram, L Lundby, C Brock, A M Drewes, S Laurberg, K Krogh, P Christensen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome - the MANUEL project.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S HaasDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Århus N, Denmark. susahaas@rm.dk.
P M FaaborgDepartment of Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
M GramMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
L LundbyDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Århus N, Denmark.
C BrockMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
A M DrewesMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
S LaurbergDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Århus N, Denmark.
K KroghNeurogastroenterology Unit, Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
P ChristensenDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Århus N, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBowel dysfunction is common after surgery for rectal cancer, especially when neoadjuvant radiotherapy is used. The role of sensory function in the pathogenesis remains obscure, and the aim of the present study was to characterize the sensory pathways of the brain-gut axis in rectal cancer patients treated with resection ± radiotherapy compared with healthy volunteers.

methodsSensory evaluation by (neo)rectal distensions was performed and sensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded during rapid balloon distensions of the (neo)rectum and anal canal in resected patients with (n = 8) or without (n = 12) radiotherapy. Twenty healthy volunteers were included for comparison. (Neo)rectal latencies and amplitudes of SEPs were compared and spectral band analysis from (neo)rectal and anal distensions was used as a proxy of neuronal processing.

resultsNeorectal sensation thresholds were significantly increased in both patient categories (all p < 0.008). There were no differences in (neo)rectal SEP latencies and amplitudes between groups. However, spectral analysis of (neo)rectal SEPs showed significant differences between all groups in all bands (all p < 0.01). On the other hand, anal SEP analyses only showed significant differences between the delta (0-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz) and, gamma 32-50 Hz) bands (all p < 0.02) between the subgroup of patients that also received radiotherapy and healthy volunteers.

conclusionsSurgery for rectal cancer leads to abnormal cortical processing of neorectal sensation. Additional radiotherapy leads to a different pattern of central sensory processing of neorectal and anal sensations. This may play a role in the functional outcome of these patients.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresProctectomyRectal NeoplasmsAnal CanalHumansManometryRectumEvoked potentialsFunctionalRadiotherapyRectal resection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.