ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2020
Course of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed during pregnancy.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural history of histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy: meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Approaches to Intraepithelial Cervical Neoplasia Management in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cervical Dysplasia Diagnosed in Pregnancy - A Pre- and Postpartum Analysis.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- The association of post-conization pregnancy with subsequent cervical lesions: evidence from a nationwide cohort in Sweden.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing the feasibility of HPV screening for cervical cancer in pregnant women in Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Review
- The significance of biological samples from pregnant women in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Pregnancy-Related Precancerous Cervical Lesions: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Evolution, and Impact upon Gestation and Fertility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cytology in pregnancy.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2024Review
- Prevalence of human papillomaviruses in self-collected samples among women attending antenatal care in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- The Fate of Cervical Dysplastic Lesions during Pregnancy and the Impact of the Delivery Mode: A Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: development during pregnancy and postpartum.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Invasive Cervical Carcinoma by Cervical Biopsy under Colposcopy and Analysis of Factors Influencing.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Influences on pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeManagement of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN grade 2 or 3 (CIN2-3)] diagnosed during pregnancy is controversial. Monitoring with colposcopy and cytology every 8-12 weeks is advised by the most current guidelines. STUDY
designThis study analyzes the course of disease in pregnant women with abnormal cytologies or clinically suspicious cervixes.
resultsIn total, 139 pregnant women, at a median age of 31 years (range 19-49), treated at the Colposcopy Unit of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2011 and 2017 were identified. During pregnancy, at least one biopsy was performed on 70.5% of patients. In 84.7% of cases, CIN2-3 (CIN2 n = 14 (14.3%), CIN3 n = 69 (70.4%)) was detected, 7.1% (n = 7) of women were diagnosed with CIN1, while no dysplasia was found in 8.2% (n = 8) of cases. No interventions were necessary during pregnancy. Despite explicit invitation, only 72.3% of women with CIN2-3 attended postpartal consultations. While 61.7% showed persistent lesions, 5% were diagnosed with CIN1 and 33.3% with complete remission. During pregnancy, 68.7% of women with prepartal CIN2-3 were tested for HPV infection. Later, 49.1% were followed up postpartally by means of HPV testing and histology. HPV clearance was observed in 36.4% of women with complete histological remission. Postpartum conization was performed on 44.6% of patients with prepartal CIN2-3 diagnosis. CIN2-3 was histologically confirmed in 97.3% cases. Progression from persistent CIN3 to microinvasive carcinoma was observed in a single case.
conclusionsHigh-grade CIN lesions, diagnosed during pregnancy, show a high rate of regression postpartum; whereas, progression to carcinoma is rare. Close and continuous monitoring rarely has any therapeutic consequences. Compliance for postpartal follow-up needs to be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.