ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2020
The role of ICP monitoring in paediatric IIH.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in children is an extrapolation of the guidelines suggested for adult population. Lumbar puncture (LP) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis. The diagnosis of IIH at times is solely dependent on the interpretation of the opening pressure (OP). Unfortunately, LP-OP can vary due circumstantial parameters and therefore may be an unreliable form of intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement. Confirming the diagnosis based (as suggested by guidelines) on LP-OP in a doubtful clinical situation would be inappropriate. The aim of our study was to analyse the reliability of LP-OP and importance of ICP monitoring in situations where diagnosis of IIH was questionable.
methodsRetrospective review of all children with diagnosis of IIH over a 10-year period was conducted. Children who underwent ICP monitoring (ICPM) were selected. We considered 2 LP-OP values-last LP (lLP) and the mean LP (mLP) for analysis. ICPM and LP-OP were compared. Follow-up till last clinic visit was also considered for long-term outcome.
resultsEleven children (male 3; female 8) were included in the study. Mean delay between LP and ICPM was 112.8 days (17-257 days). There was lack of correlation between LP-OP and ICP in 9 children. ICP monitoring refuted the diagnosis of IIH in 80% of children and prevented exposure to unnecessary medical and surgical intervention. There was 1complication with ICPM. In 90% of children, there was no progression of symptoms following a decision based on ICP monitoring on long-term follow-up (mean, 36.5 months).
conclusionWhen the diagnosis of IIH is in doubt, LP may be unreliable and formal ICP monitoring is advised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.