ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2020
[Patient reported outcome measurements in orthopedics and trauma surgery : Chances and risks for statutory quality assurance].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The routine use of patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) can support the orientation of healthcare systems towards the value and usefulness for patients. The collation of patient reported experience measurements (PREMs) is suitable for bringing transparency to the patient orientation of healthcare processes and the experience gained. Both PREM and PROM will become an integral component of the assessment of medical quality in Germany when the guidelines for data-supported quality assurance across institutions (DeQS-RL) come into force. By means of newly developed patient surveys per medical service area, they will be used as additional sources for the legally binding quality assurance. Although this gives more weight to the evaluation of the quality of treatment by patients, special features must be taken into account in the development and implementation for orthopedics and trauma surgery in order to avoid misinterpretation of the results and subsequent misguidance in the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32322921What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.