ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2020
Routine gynecological ultrasound: look at the bladder and the ureters!
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of ureteral tuberculosis from ureteral malignant tumour in women.Epidemiology and infection · 2023Article
- A Case of Incidental Detection of Asymptomatic Bladder Cancer by Transvaginal Ultrasound.Cureus · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo illustrate the technical feasibility and diagnostic value of including the assessment of the bladder and the ureters during a standard transvaginal ultrasound examination.
methodsWe present four cases illustrating ureter and bladder pathology diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound.
resultsIn a first case, transvaginal ultrasonography in a woman with lower abdominal pain showed a calculus in the left distal ureter. The small echogenic lesion was easily detectable within the ureter lumen. A second patient, presenting with suprapubic pain, urgency and back pain, was also diagnosed with a ureteral calculus and additionally a hydroureter. The presence of a hydroureter is part of the differential diagnosis of any cystic structure in the pelvis. In a third case, an elderly woman, referred with uterine prolapse, transvaginal ultrasound examination showed a tubular anechoic structure lateral in the pelvis due to a hydroureter, illustrating the differential diagnosis with a hydrosalpinx. A fourth patient, presenting with hematuria, showed an irregular and highly vascularized mass in the bladder and was diagnosed with a transitional cell carcinoma.
conclusionThe bladder and pelvic part of the ureters are easily identifiable on transvaginal scan. Important pathology of the lower urinary tract and the distal ureters can be readily diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound examination. The evaluation of the bladder and the ureters should therefore be part of the standard gynecological ultrasound investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32322831PMC7162668W3026776077What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.